From b3d1ad6355ab3ae9f859ac5edb9cdea33277e4fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jani Nikula Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:39:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging operations --- 71/741f06b3cc59137702cbbc5ab6842c7ea35440 | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) create mode 100644 71/741f06b3cc59137702cbbc5ab6842c7ea35440 diff --git a/71/741f06b3cc59137702cbbc5ab6842c7ea35440 b/71/741f06b3cc59137702cbbc5ab6842c7ea35440 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e9faa5e6c --- /dev/null +++ b/71/741f06b3cc59137702cbbc5ab6842c7ea35440 @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DC8415EB5 + for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:39:25 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.7 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id vjygq9qt5OJn for ; + Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:39:24 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com + [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 574C8415EA0 + for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:39:24 -0800 (PST) +Received: by bkcjg9 with SMTP id jg9so335006bkc.26 + for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:39:22 -0800 (PST) +Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jani@nikula.org designates + 10.112.47.232 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.47.232; +Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; + spf=pass (google.com: domain of jani@nikula.org + designates 10.112.47.232 as permitted sender) + smtp.mail=jani@nikula.org +Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.47.232]) + by 10.112.47.232 with SMTP id g8mr1291130lbn.65.1330105162900 (num_hops + = 1); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:39:22 -0800 (PST) +Received: by 10.112.47.232 with SMTP id g8mr1064064lbn.65.1330105162830; + Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:39:22 -0800 (PST) +Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe50f800-253.dhcp.inet.fi. + [84.248.80.253]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id il7sm6420390lbb.9.2012.02.24.09.39.20 + (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:39:21 -0800 (PST) +From: Jani Nikula +To: Dmitry Kurochkin , + Pieter Praet , + David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging + operations +In-Reply-To: <87linsjzb4.fsf@gmail.com> +References: <1327725684-5887-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> + <1328426033-21480-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> + <87wr7xqpuf.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> <878vjtqhcg.fsf@praet.org> + <87obsojzga.fsf@gmail.com> <87linsjzb4.fsf@gmail.com> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+206~gc02a53f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 + (i686-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:39:18 +0200 +Message-ID: <87r4xk6shl.fsf@nikula.org> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Gm-Message-State: + ALoCoQngfM8zb45RI9tm0pDzg8x6cNGuzzMrgb3sJB+ffLkdC/VHqP0aNwInFjnKF8WOJTIK2VPt +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:39:25 -0000 + +On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:33:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: +> Also can you please send new patches (and patch series) in a new +> separate thread? If they are related to another thread, you can add a +> reference. But having multiple patch series with multiple versions in a +> single thread is very confusing IMO. + +IMHO the same thread is okay if the new versions are in-reply-to the +cover letter of the first version. + +Jani. -- 2.26.2