From aebae1b236e7daca91bd8657cce434bf1646b2af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:44:51 +2000 Subject: [PATCH] RE: [Spam-verdenking][english 100%] Re: another bug fix release: 0.15.2, in progress. --- 56/0349b3941dc11f6743da70f995522c582d234a | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) create mode 100644 56/0349b3941dc11f6743da70f995522c582d234a diff --git a/56/0349b3941dc11f6743da70f995522c582d234a b/56/0349b3941dc11f6743da70f995522c582d234a new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b9e12995a --- /dev/null +++ b/56/0349b3941dc11f6743da70f995522c582d234a @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBEE431FD6 + for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:24:33 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id cLwMw-Gw9mse for ; + Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:24:33 -0800 (PST) +Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B6E8431FC4 + for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:24:28 -0800 (PST) +Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net + ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet) + by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa + (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1U4XDF-000448-KQ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:45:04 -0400 +Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1U4XD9-0003B7-VB; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:44:51 -0400 +From: David Bremner +To: Robert Mast +Subject: RE: [Spam-verdenking][english 100%] Re: another bug fix release: + 0.15.2, in progress. +In-Reply-To: <003b01ce0791$39239a50$ab6acef0$@nl> +References: <1359501973-27671-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> + <87bobt9dcq.fsf@zancas.localnet> + <003b01ce0791$39239a50$ab6acef0$@nl> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:44:51 -0400 +Message-ID: <87y5ew8er0.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain +X-Spam_bar: - +Cc: Notmuch List +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:24:34 -0000 + +Robert Mast writes: + +> David/Austin, +> +> I sent it as a patch to my previous patch. Is that correct, or should I first 'revert' the file to 15.1? +> +> Robert + +Hi Robert; + +I didn't see any followup patch from you on the list; can you tell me the +message-id? + +In any case, in general you should send complete patches or or patch series +against git master, since we care both about the commit message, and what +changes are part of each commit. Most people use the git rebase command +to update patches before re-sending them. + +d -- 2.26.2