From ade3d25879d8e06ad35c4dbdecfac2ef2120dd25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jani Nikula Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:57:54 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: Using procmail to set tags --- f2/5102beb7812359d51f0fdd91677113e77d88df | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+) create mode 100644 f2/5102beb7812359d51f0fdd91677113e77d88df diff --git a/f2/5102beb7812359d51f0fdd91677113e77d88df b/f2/5102beb7812359d51f0fdd91677113e77d88df new file mode 100644 index 000000000..26a04ee3f --- /dev/null +++ b/f2/5102beb7812359d51f0fdd91677113e77d88df @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C85431FB6 + for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 03:57:59 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.7 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 6Um7+XrfhX4z for ; + Tue, 15 May 2012 03:57:59 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com + [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A759431FAE + for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 03:57:59 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by qcsk26 with SMTP id k26so5280231qcs.26 + for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 03:57:57 -0700 (PDT) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=google.com; s=20120113; + h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date + :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; + bh=d3FREM99bphaNqPRs73IzK7PBfC2OR7DlWvl8WmkuHI=; + b=G5huZoEdcFTE5/fZSBUuNe5UlRctFjO7CDJ6ajdpppoQLTJMs07U9CI1/H1DfzkYFm + UyZPNhMFAKpPZOKDp6yRakuh8IJiyU/xBQbAXpqe6MT8L0OG0x+Ab7AGYwY8bRbMAlH1 + sGTLsP9lGszmtCn9AsR2o7SiIRqTlcYgmBKhRg/ufAXVpAx9pZaX3U+CHSinJb3/X+xy + TYQao2CpAtW0M2R5lDBxnFg1ZiWPp8DXxMaYtlfpC7lr0l3+XzPHRJtIiNXELPrspOno + g0u6H7jCUdQ3QI1J1EBkkB6EdGk9L3om4RDFIgyKyv5zzp4Sx51yBOYcZgNh6rI2qSNM + C6Zg== +Received: by 10.224.205.6 with SMTP id fo6mr2511276qab.73.1337079477398; + Tue, 15 May 2012 03:57:57 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from localhost (nikula.org. [92.243.24.172]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x10sm2322377qan.1.2012.05.15.03.57.55 + (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 15 May 2012 03:57:56 -0700 (PDT) +From: Jani Nikula +To: bryan hunt , Robert Horn +Subject: Re: Using procmail to set tags +In-Reply-To: <1337076890.12535.2.camel@dsktp> +References: <1337076890.12535.2.camel@dsktp> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+222~ga47a98c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 + (i686-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:57:54 +0000 +Message-ID: <87zk9990el.fsf@nikula.org> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Gm-Message-State: + ALoCoQl+ylrIvijMWqru6tB7vH8050tWzrkQWR7fwfhVdxN5DCKcKSOpi60ykaz+yTAit5VrPpcR +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:58:00 -0000 + +On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:14:50 +0100, bryan hunt wrote: +> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 19:34 -0400, Robert Horn wrote: +> > Is it practical (and has anyone documented) using a procmail setup to +> > set initial tags for messages using notmuch? +> > +> > I've just started using emacs-notmuch to read mail, and I'm using a +> > system where I have procmail filters to bin mail by category into +> > folders. I can continue this using folder:value for searching, but one +> > reason notmuch interests me is the potential to do more. +> > +> > It's practical for me to assign potentially overlapping tags with a more +> > sophisticated procmail setup. Notmuch tags enable having multiple tags +> > on one email. +> > +> > I don't know enough about the procmail/notmuch process to see just how +> > to make this happen. I'm hoping that someone has already done something +> > similar. +> > +> > R Horn +> > rjhorn@alum.mit.edu +> +> You could have procmail fire a python script to add or remove tags based +> upon message content. + +Note that you need to run 'notmuch new' after the message has been +delivered in order to modify the tags. Otherwise notmuch does not know +about the message. + +> The problem is that the tag removal isn't being saved. +> I've created a bug report with the developer: +> +> https://bitbucket.org/spaetz/cnotmuch/issue/1/removing-tags-doesnt-seem-to-be-saving + +That repository is obsolete; the notmuch python bindings have been +merged into upstream notmuch. If you still have problems, please report +them on this list. + + +J. -- 2.26.2