From a455342fe7a883fe2577c95627f930edaea17ccd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Walters Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:11:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: plans for 0.12 --- 17/7c0a71ea42a0d35a13a808a224f028e93c0949 | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 136 insertions(+) create mode 100644 17/7c0a71ea42a0d35a13a808a224f028e93c0949 diff --git a/17/7c0a71ea42a0d35a13a808a224f028e93c0949 b/17/7c0a71ea42a0d35a13a808a224f028e93c0949 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ad2301191 --- /dev/null +++ b/17/7c0a71ea42a0d35a13a808a224f028e93c0949 @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB09431FBD + for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:09:59 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -1.098 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, + NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id z+gJV0RRtMm8 for ; + Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:09:58 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3C53431FAE + for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:09:57 -0800 (PST) +Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) + by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) + (envelope-from ) + id 1S1ZB0-0008Vp-Oo; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:09:53 +0000 +Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] + helo=localhost) + by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) + (envelope-from ) + id 1S1ZB0-0003La-9y; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:09:50 +0000 +From: Mark Walters +To: David Bremner , notmuch +Subject: Re: plans for 0.12 +In-Reply-To: <87mx87j8eh.fsf@zancas.localnet> +References: <87mx87j8eh.fsf@zancas.localnet> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+202~g31eaf97 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 + (i486-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:11:32 +0000 +Message-ID: <87pqd2dnez.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 +X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) +X-QM-Body-MD5: 9270ba1601a6b8e65854f5ec060e31d3 (of first 20000 bytes) +X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 +X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - +X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to + determine if it is + spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. + This message scored -1.8 points. + Summary of the scoring: + * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, + * medium trust + * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] + * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail + provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) + * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + * domain + * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list +X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:09:59 -0000 + +On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:27:02 -0400, David Bremner wrote: +> +> I would like to start a freeze (i.e. merge master to release) for 0.12 +> within the next week, say March 1 for an easy to remember date. +> +> If you have suggestions for things that "should really go in", feel free +> to follow up. The main point here is bug fixes, or features which are +> there in a kindof half baked way. +> +> Bug fix wise, I know about +> +> id:"1330068983-4483-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz" +> +> This could use some review. +> +> It has also been some chatter that either (the next iteration of) +> +> id:"1329296619-7463-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" +> +> Should go in, or we should revert amdragon's exclude stuff. +> +> I don't have strong feelings either way, except it is somewhat late in +> the day for a large(ish) and complicated series. + +I agree it is a largish patch set: I think I would err against including +it for 0.12 as it has not had a lot of testing (I think only by me). It +would also allow people to work out what they wanted emacs to do with +the exclude flag. (The notmuch-show.el patch 12/13 needs simple rebasing +which I have done but not posted yet.) + +A temporary revert might be reasonable: alternatively we could just turn +off the automatic addition of the exclude tags (deleted and spam) to the +config file in notmuch-config so only users who ask for it get it on +this release. + +If it is not reverted then I think patches 1-3 of the latest series +id:"1330157204-26094-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" +might be worth including. They just add the --no-exclude option to +notmuch-count and notmuch-search and are simple (it's one "code" patch, +one "man" patch and some tests). + +I guess my favoured option would just be to disable the automatic +addition of exclude tags (ideally with patches 1-3 above, but that is +not important). + +Best wishes + +Mark + +> There are several other patch series that look ready from a review point +> of view, but I'd rather have them pushed earlier in the release cycle +> (or at least I don't see a hurry). For example +> +> id:"1329490088-8323-2-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com" +> id:"1329697590-7404-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu" +> +> My (tentative) plan is to push those once I have branched for release. +> _______________________________________________ +> notmuch mailing list +> notmuch@notmuchmail.org +> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch -- 2.26.2