From a3a73f29ab830fa4734d1e6aa3e0aa51365d1a19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 18:43:50 +2000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: plans for 0.12 --- 35/b2d93f80a37dfa563320dff83b5bbff123ee2b | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+) create mode 100644 35/b2d93f80a37dfa563320dff83b5bbff123ee2b diff --git a/35/b2d93f80a37dfa563320dff83b5bbff123ee2b b/35/b2d93f80a37dfa563320dff83b5bbff123ee2b new file mode 100644 index 000000000..176a11b52 --- /dev/null +++ b/35/b2d93f80a37dfa563320dff83b5bbff123ee2b @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70195431FB6 + for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:43:58 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id QeZ1SXLO9AmF for ; + Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:43:57 -0800 (PST) +Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1B34431FAE + for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:43:57 -0800 (PST) +Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142166230117.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net + ([142.166.230.117] helo=zancas.localnet) + by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) + (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) + id 1S3Ej6-0007h7-0u; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:56 -0400 +Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) + (envelope-from ) + id 1S3Ej0-0004Vb-MQ; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:50 -0400 +From: David Bremner +To: Pieter Praet , notmuch +Subject: Re: plans for 0.12 +In-Reply-To: <877gz4dnl2.fsf@praet.org> +References: <87mx87j8eh.fsf@zancas.localnet> <877gz4dnl2.fsf@praet.org> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+263~g4fa77d0 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:50 -0400 +Message-ID: <8762eo2b89.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Spam_bar: - +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:43:58 -0000 + +On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:21:29 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: +> +> Some of the features added/refactored post-0.11.1 don't have any +> test coverage yet. Should they, before wrapping up 0.12 ? +> (not a rhetorical question, I'm genuinely asking for opinions) +> + +Hi Pieter; + +My initial answer is probably not. I see the tests as mainly useful +during development, for detecting regressions. I think most people doing +development will be working from git, rather than the distribution +tarballs we ship. + +On the other hand, adding tests is also not that risky, so if the +concensus is strongly in favour of integrating them pre 0.12, and +somebody wants to review them all, then I'm willing to consider it. + +d -- 2.26.2