From 949c79a976e85654ac3abfc7f3ded8574470ba71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Wang Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:16:16 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [alot] reply from search mode --- ed/a69606ad08ad1d13192de2d2e46b9ac649142a | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ed/a69606ad08ad1d13192de2d2e46b9ac649142a diff --git a/ed/a69606ad08ad1d13192de2d2e46b9ac649142a b/ed/a69606ad08ad1d13192de2d2e46b9ac649142a new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c24712e22 --- /dev/null +++ b/ed/a69606ad08ad1d13192de2d2e46b9ac649142a @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A177D431FBC + for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:15:32 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id V+80W-+GvLQb for ; + Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:15:31 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com + [209.85.161.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D15C431FAE + for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:15:31 -0800 (PST) +Received: by ggni4 with SMTP id i4so3785753ggn.26 + for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:15:29 -0800 (PST) +Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of novalazy@gmail.com designates + 10.236.155.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.155.101; +Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; + spf=pass (google.com: domain of novalazy@gmail.com + designates 10.236.155.101 as permitted sender) + smtp.mail=novalazy@gmail.com; + dkim=pass header.i=novalazy@gmail.com +Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.155.101]) + by 10.236.155.101 with SMTP id i65mr38410276yhk.52.1331075729765 + (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:15:29 -0800 (PST) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references + :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition + :content-transfer-encoding; + bh=DCZxjSQ57QtNvJc47QMwRGadHQKG4vAISb1Q7OkLTmw=; + b=VsgpuwjmwJOQlvJNGOg4bAJjcAH5o956KT7KRhcjKkKFyieIylnuKTa/rJybr6xQND + Ih3CcADqqRIjT3alg8UacEUGd63zaM1s5SJ3LMzL7uYfcFB367IPQgUSnar+4EGRSSJw + YvpukTs/ISy4YZmX5nNv1XToC604sTF2FxVpUG0Hjnnojm5ZYwS1GgfeRAHSjW3+I5Lg + FJqmyI7kktqYMLV6jPidVSd87OebPKz9JsbFyycZB5V4h5Yb4dGs3NWnSQDJDmt9YCOk + hS2HwUwlrXqK60AgFv2egsRaeIcXb8RgpsysfrFwxfQjaZflEcpBClIjqM7w9gIihyXk + GYtw== +Received: by 10.236.155.101 with SMTP id i65mr30477682yhk.52.1331075729623; + Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:15:29 -0800 (PST) +Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au. + [220.233.42.215]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b6sm33169126anc.3.2012.03.06.15.15.27 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); + Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:15:28 -0800 (PST) +Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:16:16 +1100 +Message-ID: <20120307101616.GA2635@hili.localdomain> +From: Peter Wang +To: Patrick Totzke +Subject: Re: [alot] reply from search mode +In-Reply-To: <20120306211747.31898.21772@brick.lan> +References: <20120306160016.2673.36080@plc.plecavalier.com> + <20120306211747.31898.21772@brick.lan> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:15:32 -0000 + +On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:17:47 +0000, Patrick Totzke wrote: +> Quoting Philippe LeCavalier (2012-03-06 16:00:16) +> >How would I add a reply key binding to reply directly from the search +> >mode. ie something like R. Forward and editnew would be nice as well. +> +> This could indeed be useful, but I'm not convinced this is a great idea in general: +> What would that command do if your selection is a thread with multiple leaf-mails? +> reply to the first? ask the user? + +I have yet to implement this in bower, but my idea is to reply to the +only message in the thread with the "unread" tag. Abort if there is +more than one such message. + +Peter -- 2.26.2