From 7d2f426c69ee1aa8dfa14a3464c032b5bace56b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Walters Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:22:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: search summary and exclusions --- 8a/3de6f17c5134c97c4ab814bee96461595b41c7 | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+) create mode 100644 8a/3de6f17c5134c97c4ab814bee96461595b41c7 diff --git a/8a/3de6f17c5134c97c4ab814bee96461595b41c7 b/8a/3de6f17c5134c97c4ab814bee96461595b41c7 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..156e8f58f --- /dev/null +++ b/8a/3de6f17c5134c97c4ab814bee96461595b41c7 @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F264C431FB6 + for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:22:37 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -1.098 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, + NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 6OLuAdg8QXxT for ; + Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:22:35 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F052431FAE + for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:22:35 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) + by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) + (envelope-from ) + id 1Sg9of-0008Nd-O5; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:22:33 +0100 +Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] + helo=localhost) + by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) + (envelope-from ) + id 1Sg9of-0006oc-Ch; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:22:33 +0100 +From: Mark Walters +To: Peter Wang , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: search summary and exclusions +In-Reply-To: <20120617170325.GA18059@hili.localdomain> +References: <20120529000012.GF2331@hili.localdomain> + <87mx4sp79z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> + <20120529140107.GE2347@hili.localdomain> + <87fwajnibz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> + <20120530130733.GC2332@hili.localdomain> + <878vgam7lg.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> + <20120617170325.GA18059@hili.localdomain> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+63~g548a9bf (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:22:30 +0100 +Message-ID: <87zk82l7wp.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 +X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) +X-QM-Body-MD5: 8550063a1a89af19f0afbef57a432d43 (of first 20000 bytes) +X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 +X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - +X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to + determine if it is + spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. + This message scored -1.8 points. + Summary of the scoring: + * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, + * medium trust + * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] + * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail + provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) + * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + * domain + * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list +X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 07:22:38 -0000 + + +On Sun, 17 Jun 2012, Peter Wang wrote: +> On Wed, 30 May 2012 08:49:31 +0100, Mark Walters wrote: +>> +>> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Peter Wang wrote: +>> > +>> > Maybe there is room for another keyword under --exclude? +>> +>> Yes that might be the best way to go. Something like --exclude=all and +>> then excluded messages never appear anywhere? +>> +>> I think it should be easy: I will try to send a patch tonight. +> +> Hi Mark, +> +> Did you get a chance to try this? Otherwise I can have a look. + +Hi sorry I did try this but got distracted. Doing it neatly turned out +to be a bit bigger than I expected. I will post what I had as a reply to +this message, but I don't think I will be able to work on it any time +soon so feel free to take it over. + +I think it all works but I have not tested it very much. + +Best wishes + +Mark + -- 2.26.2