From 7ceae5948dda764bcdb2f8486454c90dbcfa5c36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Walters Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 09:47:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers --- c4/4f014f05cdcd60b1833e8dab7208f973165af9 | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 c4/4f014f05cdcd60b1833e8dab7208f973165af9 diff --git a/c4/4f014f05cdcd60b1833e8dab7208f973165af9 b/c4/4f014f05cdcd60b1833e8dab7208f973165af9 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1cfd3cf0a --- /dev/null +++ b/c4/4f014f05cdcd60b1833e8dab7208f973165af9 @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B16431FB6 + for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 01:47:49 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 1.401 +X-Spam-Level: * +X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, + FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id ZB94zguvTeMO for ; + Thu, 5 Jul 2012 01:47:49 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7255431FAE + for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 01:47:48 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) + by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) + (envelope-from ) + id 1Smhj1-0004Cd-1B; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 09:47:47 +0100 +Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] + helo=localhost) + by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) + (envelope-from ) + id 1Smhj0-0004yw-Py; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 09:47:46 +0100 +From: Mark Walters +To: Peter Wang , + Jameson Graef Rollins +Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers +In-Reply-To: <20120704182459.GI2342@hili.localdomain> +References: <1340508470-16606-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> + <1340508470-16606-2-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> + <87vci471tw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> + <20120704115951.GC2342@hili.localdomain> + <87pq8c6zad.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> + <20120704182459.GI2342@hili.localdomain> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+70~gb6a56e7 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 09:47:43 +0100 +Message-ID: <87vci2egr4.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 +X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) +X-QM-Body-MD5: f45152b962d9d74d44f59f508694b975 (of first 20000 bytes) +X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.2 +X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - +X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to + determine if it is + spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. + This message scored -1.2 points. + Summary of the scoring: + * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, + * medium trust + * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] + * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail + provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) + * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + * domain + * 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails + * 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list +X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:47:49 -0000 + +On Wed, 04 Jul 2012, Peter Wang wrote: +> On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:22:18 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: +>> On Tue, Jul 03 2012, Peter Wang wrote: +>> > I want to see what the sender intended, before hitting reply. +>> +>> Given that there have been requests to see a lot of other headers as +>> well, we probably need to have a discussion about which ones are worth +>> of emitting, and how we give the user some more general control to see +>> the ones they want. Either that or we just emit them all? +> +> If we start with the obvious: +> +> notmuch show --output-headers=date,from,subject,to,cc,reply-to ... +> +> with the default being the current set. +> +> Emitting everything would be easier but seems wasteful. I just looked +> at a random message: in RFC822 syntax the header is 4073 bytes, and the +> body is 1116 bytes. Keeping only the fields that notmuch emits reduces +> the header to 295 bytes. Reply-To is 92 bytes, but not every message +> has that. + +I wonder if it would make sense for this option to be combined with +something like +id:"1341041595-5858-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" which +chooses whether to output the body of the message or not. + +Maybe something like --output=short|medium|full +with short being just the brief headers, medium being the current +default of brief headers and text bodies, and full being message with +all headers. + +I am not sure I like it (as someone will want full headers and no +bodies!) but we don't want the command line to get too cluttered. + +Another possibility for this particular choice: could a list of wanted +headers be included in the config file? Since I think you want it for +"user wants to see it" reasons rather than "program needs it to do +something" reasons that might make sense. + +Best wishes + +Mark + -- 2.26.2