From 7b54f926721074aced28664f5d8080dbc3a1d674 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Ulrich=20M=C3=BCller?= Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:42:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] app-editors/emacs: Fix build failure with 17.0 profiles. The following comment from upstream is in configure.ac of emacs-25.3: "-no-pie or -nopie fixes a temacs segfault on Gentoo, OpenBSD, Ubuntu, and other systems with "hardened" GCC configurations for some reason (Bug#18784). We don't know why this works, but not segfaulting is better than segfaulting." Adding -no-pie to 23.4 and 24.5 appears to make them build, too. Note that only append-ldflags fixes the build failure, while append-flags does not (at least not for 23.4). Thanks to Mats Lidell for pointing me to the above upstream comment. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639568 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/639570 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.17, Repoman-2.3.6 --- app-editors/emacs/emacs-23.4-r16.ebuild | 1 + app-editors/emacs/emacs-24.5-r4.ebuild | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/app-editors/emacs/emacs-23.4-r16.ebuild b/app-editors/emacs/emacs-23.4-r16.ebuild index 210f81f16181..230f36053ce5 100644 --- a/app-editors/emacs/emacs-23.4-r16.ebuild +++ b/app-editors/emacs/emacs-23.4-r16.ebuild @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ src_configure() { strip-flags filter-flags -fstrict-aliasing -pie append-flags $(test-flags -fno-strict-aliasing) + append-ldflags $(test-flags -no-pie) #639568 if use sh; then replace-flags "-O[1-9]" -O0 #262359 diff --git a/app-editors/emacs/emacs-24.5-r4.ebuild b/app-editors/emacs/emacs-24.5-r4.ebuild index 12bb3ccaf3b7..1dd73ddaf8c0 100644 --- a/app-editors/emacs/emacs-24.5-r4.ebuild +++ b/app-editors/emacs/emacs-24.5-r4.ebuild @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ src_prepare() { src_configure() { strip-flags filter-flags -pie #526948 + append-ldflags $(test-flags -no-pie) #639570 if use sh; then replace-flags "-O[1-9]" -O0 #262359 -- 2.26.2