From 75cdd17070603c947d6819aded39a074b7d8cdef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:39:52 +2100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: priorities for 0.13 --- 8a/d5bf40b0d4d89fa8003b3b365b67211d9fb482 | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+) create mode 100644 8a/d5bf40b0d4d89fa8003b3b365b67211d9fb482 diff --git a/8a/d5bf40b0d4d89fa8003b3b365b67211d9fb482 b/8a/d5bf40b0d4d89fa8003b3b365b67211d9fb482 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c7f1daa84 --- /dev/null +++ b/8a/d5bf40b0d4d89fa8003b3b365b67211d9fb482 @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6210431FAF + for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:40:08 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 8YzJpbdNp1t7 for ; + Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:40:06 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF879431FAE + for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:40:06 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net + ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet) + by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) + (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) + id 1SOZyQ-00047L-AH; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:40:02 -0300 +Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) + (envelope-from ) + id 1SOZyL-0006pD-0o; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:39:53 -0300 +From: David Bremner +To: notmuch +Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13 +In-Reply-To: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet> +References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+140~g0c819b9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:39:52 -0300 +Message-ID: <87ehr6fhtj.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Spam_bar: - +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:40:09 -0000 + +David Bremner writes: + +> Hi All; +> +> I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of +> May. What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and +> pushed for 0.13? +> + +So here are some patches that people expressed interest in for 0.13, but +need more review. + + id:"1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca" + + id:"1334431301-27303-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" + + id:"1335651473-19652-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu" + +Note that in particular it makes sense to push amdragon's changes while +we are bumping the SONAME. + +The sequence by Jamie + + id:"1334429574-12918-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net" + +Has only one minor comment about a comment; I'm not sure it's enough for +a rebase on it's own. Mark, what do you think? + +d -- 2.26.2