From 694e990b3e07ce7f6122b0c14813f15bb9fdb6b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jameson Graef Rollins Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:46:36 +1600 Subject: [PATCH] Re: RFC notmuch-pick: an emacs threaded message view with split-pane --- c9/77a68ba3c770a5b73cae8f6d4829d10c423481 | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+) create mode 100644 c9/77a68ba3c770a5b73cae8f6d4829d10c423481 diff --git a/c9/77a68ba3c770a5b73cae8f6d4829d10c423481 b/c9/77a68ba3c770a5b73cae8f6d4829d10c423481 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8ceb6f1a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/c9/77a68ba3c770a5b73cae8f6d4829d10c423481 @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFF2429E52 + for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:46:43 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -2.29 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id O3QF7AbX8mwm for ; + Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:46:43 -0800 (PST) +Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu + [131.215.239.19]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1984431FAE + for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:46:42 -0800 (PST) +Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5C366E00C3; + Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:46:42 -0800 (PST) +X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new +Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com + [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) + by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDD166E00D0; + Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:46:39 -0800 (PST) +Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) + id 39D364DE; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:46:39 -0800 (PST) +From: Jameson Graef Rollins +To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: RFC notmuch-pick: an emacs threaded message view with split-pane +In-Reply-To: <87d39k1gvi.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +References: <87d39k1gvi.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+156~gde94716 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:46:36 -0800 +Message-ID: <8762fb3hlf.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; + micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:46:43 -0000 + +--=-=-= +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:32:48 +0000, Mark Walters wrote: +> On irc recently dme posted a patch notmuch-pick.el which provided a +> threaded message view in the emacs interface. I have added substantially +> to it and made some cli changes to support it better. See +> http://kanelephant.com/screen.png for a screenshot. +>=20 +> It seems to be working well (although doubtless has bugs and lots of +> room for improvement). +>=20 +> One important caveat is that it does call notmuch-show rather than +> notmuch-search so it can be slow. Viewing 10000 notmuch messages takes +> me 20 seconds with a warm cache and about a minute with a cold +> cache. Viewing million message searches in this fashion is not +> recommended!=20 + +Hey, Mark. I really like the idea, since I've been looking for +something like this for a while, but there's something I'm confused +about. Is this meant to replace notmuch-search, or notmuch-show? I had +been hoping for a notmuch *show* replacement that shows the nice tree +view for the thread, with a single message view below. But it sounds +like you're meant to be replacing notmuch search? That seems confusing +to me, particularly in light of the big performance hit you describe. + +I'll wait for some further explanation before I jump into a full review. + +jamie. + +--=-=-= +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- +Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) + +iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPOCUtAAoJEO00zqvie6q8kN8QAImayK2LA+uxnjGbCeIrJQxE +sYITDhM/JLSft6eP6uZH9YVi4q3FwRGpHKjITShmaEFiTrIXHPUuaTIZH5zxfUFV +jdf7J18nUiScNceEZFdrguvDVwK4rywuIf/MugAQR5+zJ68GhdtAN1U6bkxVg+MN +q89fyMz5SN8MI+cwzJ+MGikNOdaWBJfw1P1x5/nX0BAf0lV2o2gNBeGQDQS2xLvV +3n7Pr85uxH3IB8mX+MXDqviKdOWC03eTRiiqotO/8Qy1y5GHkSwxdtII6hPmnGiz +9pv+Tn2moF/osYipAHmfmN14yITyYOOEMsHXMM2qbSWBjMr4Ipgd66mWwUaVAouO +DQcNACFCfeW/eQItI32dk31ozdyPDp7maaV/5ntquVaAj7pNKVhqkU+DCFSZpBIr +DKIszR6lDlseIFAbHL2vJDEaiEmt+WLa5c63IjXJrK4RnQs9Q3qCJ7D4r4kZiYBh +Bz7jvvRXagOCfRZITz+/rpiuzSgYpOCNr9tJxYhqssd1Q2ILd6NOvR8h1F3oMIjH +D0+QpgZEAEwcIfnclhwUeRRTZtsexoTPtKr6vjO3rxRAo7jnTnTtD4QCwHrEHJd6 +B/2dbKfmYvljxWRgZDSCGZcXV8x5pxEkh4Fgmnd+0rw/gf9PjN1g9ed6ezkMr48q +RZkalMxIWnJ1cbZcpNCh +=Hj2J +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +--=-=-=-- -- 2.26.2