From 65ebe7af8c1b47b7fc6840a23bc0ba12755a43da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastien Binet Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:59:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Re: post-new [was: Re: query on a subset of messages ?] --- 61/ca1487d42f4e46c4a41eb2a102d3ab388cc8b2 | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+) create mode 100644 61/ca1487d42f4e46c4a41eb2a102d3ab388cc8b2 diff --git a/61/ca1487d42f4e46c4a41eb2a102d3ab388cc8b2 b/61/ca1487d42f4e46c4a41eb2a102d3ab388cc8b2 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f61dc8d1b --- /dev/null +++ b/61/ca1487d42f4e46c4a41eb2a102d3ab388cc8b2 @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D40C431E82 + for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 02:59:47 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -5 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id zoJcLtAR1VLE for ; + Tue, 10 Jul 2012 02:59:45 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from CERNMX30.cern.ch (cernmx30.cern.ch [137.138.144.177]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BD22431E64 + for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 02:59:45 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from CERNFE22.cern.ch (137.138.144.151) by cernmxgwlb2.cern.ch + (137.138.144.177) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.283.3; + Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:59:40 +0200 +Received: from localhost (134.158.88.68) by smtp.cern.ch (137.138.144.172) + with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; + Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:59:40 +0200 +From: Sebastien Binet +To: Jani Nikula , Jameson Graef Rollins + +Subject: Re: post-new [was: Re: query on a subset of messages ?] +In-Reply-To: + +References: <871ukl5oj7.fsf@cern.ch> <87ehol2aku.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> + <87wr2c3mtj.fsf@cern.ch> <87r4sk3lxu.fsf@cern.ch> + <8739503llz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> + +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+60~g7ecf77d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1 + (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) +Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:59:39 +0200 +Message-ID: <871ukk2ayc.fsf@cern.ch> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; + protocol="application/pgp-signature" +X-Originating-IP: [134.158.88.68] +Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -50 +Cc: Notmuch Mail +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:59:47 -0000 + +--=-=-= +Content-Type: text/plain + +Jani Nikula writes: + +> On Jul 9, 2012 8:12 PM, "Jameson Graef Rollins" +> wrote: +>> +>> On Mon, Jul 09 2012, Sebastien Binet wrote: +>> > hum... is post-new supposed to be run even if there is no new message ? +>> +>> Hi, Sebastian. Yes, I think it runs regardless if there are any new +>> messages or not. +> +> That's correct; only errors in notmuch new cause post-new hook to be +> skipped. + +ok. I thought using the post-new hook would have saved some i/o +resources over my current setup: + offlineimap.postsynchook = ~/emacs/notmuch-lib/notmuch-tag.sh + +where notmuch-tag.sh is (in pseudo-code): +## +/usr/bin/notmuch new + +for tag,query in tag-queries: + tag_new $tag $query + +## + +is there any advantage of using post-new compared to this setup ? + +-s + +--=-=-= +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- +Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) + +iEYEARECAAYFAk/7/QsACgkQPj4AVbsZCCYG+ACgovkkfxC8rj63LxkD6iHbcS8a +TeEAn3UDozbQ64b4b2tARvez3OxYGv3R +=Rdqr +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +--=-=-=-- -- 2.26.2