From 5bcba09e206673112345b3c384b75d5d74d18f2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Micha=C5=82=20Nazarewicz?= Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:39:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] RE: Reply all - issue --- ef/f735aac603759a259b2af4f064695f43e8e5a5 | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ef/f735aac603759a259b2af4f064695f43e8e5a5 diff --git a/ef/f735aac603759a259b2af4f064695f43e8e5a5 b/ef/f735aac603759a259b2af4f064695f43e8e5a5 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..db8ffa5fd --- /dev/null +++ b/ef/f735aac603759a259b2af4f064695f43e8e5a5 @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3925D431FB6 + for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:39:49 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.698 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, + HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id usJp0+xPCRjM for ; + Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:39:48 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com (mail-lb0-f169.google.com + [209.85.217.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1B2E431FAE + for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:39:47 -0800 (PST) +Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m4so6569592lbo.0 + for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 02:39:45 -0800 (PST) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date + :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; + bh=LZQRR7999u2s2zLHdrWW6OBVBck+rBTTDEUvUSmA7/c=; + b=d/n5oU1+WQF1pgA+FZH/TvJqn9sVn9x+jGKqYYvlbL7ZGojqFn5oeUp3GGmAzkmZ6N + Va99uCorti4KiAs6BAfHCbTVmZ4GV03MNP2XydnJQGFaqKy8afxWgK1vhWqQ6QQuN90r + FS/SDSZq0mpboZgohQSRx5KKkoUds15lCMkvThqc6Na44Pa1RQfS17dNMjs6wBoZwYaY + VAhJoWoGFvWz0OQ2FMVR9eK6l/KdrJRpLjYPo+ksOKd1QJ85JqW/yL3T1ytR9OasTLje + Oo4Eh/TGQ0q9eretETiDVw8iyThYz7AfEVwBjKct5lmvbrG36ICqkv4LOp7mOD462bmW + z4lg== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.112.23.136 with SMTP id m8mr8082038lbf.53.1359974384828; + Mon, 04 Feb 2013 02:39:44 -0800 (PST) +Sender: mnazarewicz@gmail.com +Received: by 10.114.99.65 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:39:44 -0800 (PST) +Received: by 10.114.99.65 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:39:44 -0800 (PST) +In-Reply-To: <000001ce0161$5da40990$18ec1cb0$@nl> +References: <000001cdfcd9$82500f00$86f02d00$@nl> + + <000001ce0161$5da40990$18ec1cb0$@nl> +Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:39:44 +0100 +X-Google-Sender-Auth: 57rVVK4hNkAOjgCZ9gT3QZCOvtA +Message-ID: + +Subject: RE: Reply all - issue +From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Nazarewicz?= +To: Robert Mast +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4efe304a1c828704d4e3b659 +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:39:49 -0000 + +--e0cb4efe304a1c828704d4e3b659 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +2 lut 2013 17:21, "Robert Mast" napisa=C5= +=82(a): +> So Gmail-threading is still the best I suppose, + +I strongly disagree. Having said that, as long as it's configurable I +obviously won't be blocking your efforts. + +> Anyone interested in me patching Notmuch, or shall I keep the changes to +myself? + +I was actually wondering that instead of hard coding the logic into notmuch +itself, maybe it would be better to provide some sort of "split-thread" and +"join-threads" which could than be used by separate tagging tool. + +To be user-friendly this may require a possibly to search for all ancestors +of a given message and possibly an option to sort results topologically +which I dunno if notmuch has. + +--e0cb4efe304a1c828704d4e3b659 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +

2 lut 2013 17:21, "Robert Mast" <beheerder@tekenbeetziekten.nl> na= +pisa=C5=82(a):
+> So Gmail-threading is still the best I suppose,

+

I strongly disagree. Having said that, as long as it's c= +onfigurable I obviously won't be blocking your efforts.

+

> Anyone interested in me patching Notmuch, or shall I ke= +ep the changes to myself?

+

I was actually wondering that instead of hard coding the log= +ic into notmuch itself, maybe it would be better to provide some sort of &q= +uot;split-thread" and "join-threads" which could than be use= +d by separate tagging tool.

+ +

To be user-friendly this may require a possibly to search fo= +r all ancestors of a given message and possibly an option to sort results t= +opologically which I dunno if notmuch has.

+ +--e0cb4efe304a1c828704d4e3b659-- -- 2.26.2