From 5348b2a73429c3aecd6d84c8e0c347842692fe86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Walters Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:00:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs --- 4e/2fb5ac8f1578840b8a8c86baa6cb42b33b5c8f | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 124 insertions(+) create mode 100644 4e/2fb5ac8f1578840b8a8c86baa6cb42b33b5c8f diff --git a/4e/2fb5ac8f1578840b8a8c86baa6cb42b33b5c8f b/4e/2fb5ac8f1578840b8a8c86baa6cb42b33b5c8f new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b8b63b0a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/4e/2fb5ac8f1578840b8a8c86baa6cb42b33b5c8f @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECF6431FB6 + for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:21 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -1.098 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, + NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 4EiGc2CaktAq for ; + Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:20 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86FA6431FAF + for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:20 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) + by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) + (envelope-from ) + id 1SkVBb-0001ML-7X; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:00:16 +0100 +Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] + helo=localhost) + by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) + (envelope-from ) + id 1SkVBa-0003jE-Sf; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:00:11 +0100 +From: Mark Walters +To: Ethan +Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs +In-Reply-To: + +References: <1340656899-5644-1-git-send-email-ethan@betacantrips.com> + <87bok3m70p.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> + +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+51~gf947b9b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:00:05 +0100 +Message-ID: <87a9zmr4ay.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 +X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) +X-QM-Body-MD5: fdc0a9b93538119189081300f67c49fe (of first 20000 bytes) +X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 +X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - +X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to + determine if it is + spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. + This message scored -1.8 points. + Summary of the scoring: + * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, + * medium trust + * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] + * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail + provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) + * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + * domain + * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list +X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:00:21 -0000 + + +Hi + +On Fri, 29 Jun 2012, Ethan wrote: +> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Mark Walters wrote: +> +>> +>> Just a quick question: does this update the database with +>> maildir://files URIs instead of just filenames? In other words is it +>> safe to try out on actual mailstores? +>> +> +> It doesn't change any of the existing filenames or do anything like a +> database "upgrade". If you run notmuch new, it should add a URI-based +> filename to each message, but I don't think it should remove old filenames, +> so I would expect it to be fine. But I didn't expect anyone to try it on +> their actual mail database. + +The breakage I observed was when trying to reply to a message after +reverting to master: on the command line I got + +Error opening /database_path/maildir:///full_path_of_file: No such file or directory + +When doing notmuch search output=files I see both possibilities. + +Surprisingly notmuch new does not seem to remove these entries. + +>> (I used it on a trial system but when I reverted to master some things +>> seemed to stop working) +> +> Sorry for breaking it :) + +It was no problem for me: it was just a test corpus of 10,000 message +that I use for testing. + +In case anyone else has problems the following solved it for me: + +1) dump the tags +2) delete the .notmuch subdirectory of the mail store +3) run notmuch new +4) restore the tags + +Best wishes + +Mark -- 2.26.2