From 4796659ca7cb43e60fe1a293a0cb1ab937d948e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Suvayu Ali Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:29:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: Reply all - issue --- ca/b30fabc64b75dfff8ef9d27e4c6104635c80cf | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ca/b30fabc64b75dfff8ef9d27e4c6104635c80cf diff --git a/ca/b30fabc64b75dfff8ef9d27e4c6104635c80cf b/ca/b30fabc64b75dfff8ef9d27e4c6104635c80cf new file mode 100644 index 000000000..42e3a212e --- /dev/null +++ b/ca/b30fabc64b75dfff8ef9d27e4c6104635c80cf @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F96A431FBC + for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:30:11 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 6D9QdUhU0LAy for ; + Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:30:10 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com + [209.85.212.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A1F431FB6 + for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:30:10 -0800 (PST) +Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hn17so1763729wib.10 + for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:30:09 -0800 (PST) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to + :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition + :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; + bh=kfdorMZUCNu93+YnD6teziIoaCLn4d5e6C85JC6e74g=; + b=s9SE8/EdmmyyuWagH+KHyR9OsoOPEWCKicgW+dy26vCyWLzumQ3lPTAwB3wrdL3D+r + 2lfYpTIqaFlFlBtESsQDf8ewFIwXr3I1VA1Rl+i1Z1HYZguhNGgNxrG258N3pcH0lmWa + 36Vf7j6bEWnprOqXdDoZR1/Gzhrn1TmZvqM58Ixp3bt6j67OBkcOuG7MbQgqgaDKsZ/i + lrRtqcSu8MsvsIBhL+021LupDS7xPh0FKl8OqOoXfdYBAsvrubR87OvNNRNttgWRS4xA + s5dbfj4rCbxtqFy/XJlP1G42Edl9BklJM7SnK3SBJ2swCO89SnURnJu5UuhglFjSQiHq + KvDQ== +X-Received: by 10.180.96.194 with SMTP id du2mr11228881wib.19.1359991800232; + Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:30:00 -0800 (PST) +Received: from kuru.dyndns-at-home.com (pb-d-128-141-52-150.cern.ch. + [128.141.52.150]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hb9sm2555277wib.3.2013.02.04.07.29.58 + (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); + Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:29:58 -0800 (PST) +Sender: suvayu ali +Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:29:56 +0100 +From: Suvayu Ali +To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: Reply all - issue +Message-ID: <20130204152956.GD23614@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> +Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +References: <000001cdfcd9$82500f00$86f02d00$@nl> + + <000001ce0161$5da40990$18ec1cb0$@nl> + +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit +In-Reply-To: + +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2011-07-01) +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:30:11 -0000 + +On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:39:44AM +0100, Michał Nazarewicz wrote: +> 2 lut 2013 17:21, "Robert Mast" napisał(a): +> > Anyone interested in me patching Notmuch, or shall I keep the changes to +> myself? +> +> I was actually wondering that instead of hard coding the logic into notmuch +> itself, maybe it would be better to provide some sort of "split-thread" and +> "join-threads" which could than be used by separate tagging tool. +> +> To be user-friendly this may require a possibly to search for all ancestors +> of a given message and possibly an option to sort results topologically +> which I dunno if notmuch has. + +This would be a wonderful addition. :) + +-- +Suvayu + +Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- 2.26.2