From 46df148b178de7ff1c8763923c16ac4b94387fc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pieter Praet Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 20:52:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: plans for 0.12 --- 9b/87d2250ce9c9721ea05c526b6f9bcdd8190fdf | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+) create mode 100644 9b/87d2250ce9c9721ea05c526b6f9bcdd8190fdf diff --git a/9b/87d2250ce9c9721ea05c526b6f9bcdd8190fdf b/9b/87d2250ce9c9721ea05c526b6f9bcdd8190fdf new file mode 100644 index 000000000..af4e68105 --- /dev/null +++ b/9b/87d2250ce9c9721ea05c526b6f9bcdd8190fdf @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E54E431FB6 + for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:52:16 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.7 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 4wQEOOILEgTV for ; + Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:52:15 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com + [74.125.82.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client + certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id + 7A7FD431FAE for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:52:15 -0800 + (PST) +Received: by wgbds10 with SMTP id ds10so3355575wgb.2 + for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:52:14 -0800 (PST) +Received: by 10.180.24.4 with SMTP id q4mr28694884wif.7.1331149934119; + Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:52:14 -0800 (PST) +Received: from localhost ([109.131.36.23]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h19sm38115817wiw.9.2012.03.07.11.52.13 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); + Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:52:13 -0800 (PST) +From: Pieter Praet +To: David Bremner , notmuch +Subject: Re: plans for 0.12 +In-Reply-To: <8762eo2b89.fsf@zancas.localnet> +References: <87mx87j8eh.fsf@zancas.localnet> <877gz4dnl2.fsf@praet.org> + <8762eo2b89.fsf@zancas.localnet> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+210~g6afc43e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 + (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) +Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:52:05 +0100 +Message-ID: <87fwdk42ai.fsf@praet.org> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Gm-Message-State: + ALoCoQlLDboJMebkPpABL7VC6cXGXbzFlOPPiRVnpAsXKLfvOJdYHjU1ArmJywH4ctY3SWJ3WY6L +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 19:52:16 -0000 + +On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:50 -0400, David Bremner wrote: +> On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:21:29 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: +> > +> > Some of the features added/refactored post-0.11.1 don't have any +> > test coverage yet. Should they, before wrapping up 0.12 ? +> > (not a rhetorical question, I'm genuinely asking for opinions) +> > +> +> Hi Pieter; +> +> My initial answer is probably not. I see the tests as mainly useful +> during development, for detecting regressions. I think most people doing +> development will be working from git, rather than the distribution +> tarballs we ship. +> +> On the other hand, adding tests is also not that risky, so if the +> concensus is strongly in favour of integrating them pre 0.12, and +> somebody wants to review them all, then I'm willing to consider it. +> + +Fair enough. + +Just in case anyone considers them beneficial and/or is willing to +review (whether it be for inclusion in 0.12 or later), I've gotten +rid of the merge conflict by moving the last test to a new file +called `emacs-search' [1] (also see [2]). Other than that, it +remains unchanged. + +> d + + +Peace + +-- +Pieter + +[1] id:"1331149792-17192-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org" +[2] id:"87aa47euao.fsf@praet.org" -- 2.26.2