From 3c7429911bf3a178455ace482a21f3561301d987 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Wang Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 18:24:59 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers --- f5/973956a504d71689988a0c664973fdee12772e | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+) create mode 100644 f5/973956a504d71689988a0c664973fdee12772e diff --git a/f5/973956a504d71689988a0c664973fdee12772e b/f5/973956a504d71689988a0c664973fdee12772e new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9a597d808 --- /dev/null +++ b/f5/973956a504d71689988a0c664973fdee12772e @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AE1431FB6 + for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 01:25:11 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id nn246AbxbId0 for ; + Wed, 4 Jul 2012 01:25:07 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com + [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A209F431FAE + for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 01:25:07 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by pbbrr13 with SMTP id rr13so13319298pbb.26 + for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:25:05 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references + :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition + :content-transfer-encoding; + bh=Tx0Ceeu51/tA59K/OKJ3w6/z5tceQjfdTz+xpfGQZkw=; + b=vT1znrPQlgAjWhr29KEIs2OEQGgjsg9trGEJXei1ewXY57+y9pPs8nCxvsaq3nKuWl + OXM03TFj9uJu0AAEvZz8ThnXduQt5SvhfgmXnLdkIlUgpSqxuSSbD6GH306El/rc24nC + wxiCJbTnkUL5aFN7G7rrz9vTqOV5HiNqpXVa4kbpoGVgES7R99kKo1CuJi7gL+1sqoLJ + YsIEjX3KOhHqslsp6pJ6DWlY3LXPvubdqBea9DrjxqIUXW32VHYTrqEYw9xYgmrZZSbD + 1gyAfmj0B4qTqYeGZOTxcXEwKW9ZVQq118g/TJGGagfDwJ+/pwsQn/bZfXjmmmefbsQg + 460A== +Received: by 10.68.219.162 with SMTP id pp2mr16139802pbc.85.1341390305602; + Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:25:05 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au. + [220.233.42.215]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iv8sm17276798pbc.53.2012.07.04.01.25.02 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); + Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:25:04 -0700 (PDT) +Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 18:24:59 +1000 +Message-ID: <20120704182459.GI2342@hili.localdomain> +From: Peter Wang +To: Jameson Graef Rollins +Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers +In-Reply-To: <87pq8c6zad.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +References: <1340508470-16606-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> + <1340508470-16606-2-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> + <87vci471tw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> + <20120704115951.GC2342@hili.localdomain> + <87pq8c6zad.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 08:25:11 -0000 + +On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:22:18 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: +> On Tue, Jul 03 2012, Peter Wang wrote: +> > I want to see what the sender intended, before hitting reply. +> +> Given that there have been requests to see a lot of other headers as +> well, we probably need to have a discussion about which ones are worth +> of emitting, and how we give the user some more general control to see +> the ones they want. Either that or we just emit them all? + +If we start with the obvious: + + notmuch show --output-headers=date,from,subject,to,cc,reply-to ... + +with the default being the current set. + +Emitting everything would be easier but seems wasteful. I just looked +at a random message: in RFC822 syntax the header is 4073 bytes, and the +body is 1116 bytes. Keeping only the fields that notmuch emits reduces +the header to 295 bytes. Reply-To is 92 bytes, but not every message +has that. + +Peter -- 2.26.2