From 3871975fdf5d76422c3a2ec84900e703f56f9a15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 18:37:55 +2100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: Bug#683505: notmuch: FTBFS if built twice in a row: unrepresentable changes to source --- 92/38de1781394c0b9890444d78f86716593427f5 | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+) create mode 100644 92/38de1781394c0b9890444d78f86716593427f5 diff --git a/92/38de1781394c0b9890444d78f86716593427f5 b/92/38de1781394c0b9890444d78f86716593427f5 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..aafa6678c --- /dev/null +++ b/92/38de1781394c0b9890444d78f86716593427f5 @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A170431FAF + for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:38:13 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id cD97IJS5vI+E for ; + Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:38:12 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89F21431FAE + for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:38:12 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from convex-new.cs.unb.ca ([131.202.245.35]) + by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa + (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) + (envelope-from ) + id 1SwgcD-0002rT-Ht; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:38:03 -0300 +Received: from bremner by convex-new.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.80) + (envelope-from ) + id 1Swgc8-0004nf-0r; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:37:56 -0300 +From: David Bremner +To: Jameson Graef Rollins , + 683505@bugs.debian.org, Jakub Wilk +Subject: Re: Bug#683505: notmuch: FTBFS if built twice in a row: + unrepresentable changes to source +In-Reply-To: <878vdyvdjg.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +References: <20120801103707.GA668@jwilk.net> + <87pq7aabl8.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> + <878vdyvdjg.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:37:55 -0300 +Message-ID: <87ipd29tu4.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Spam_bar: - +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:38:13 -0000 + +Jameson Graef Rollins writes: + +> If a test is failing shouldn't the package build fail as well? That +> sounds like the real issue to me. + +As I mentioned on IRC, the test only fails on the Debian build machines +(building in a clean chroot using sbuild is not enough) so it isn't +really clear how to duplicate the it. Perhaps building in a clean +virtual machine without networking would do it. For which tests fail, +see + +https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=notmuch&arch=i386&ver=0.13.2-1&stamp=1338740444 + +I think the first things to fail are emacs tests. At a wild guess, it +looks like all of the failing tests are related to emacs. + +I don't think failing the build is the right thing to do, since there +does not actually seem to be anything wrong with the resulting +packages. So removing them from Debian because of some problems with +running the test suite seems a bit extreme. People not using +notmuch-emacs would probably be especially annoyed ;). + +d -- 2.26.2