From 3115303b0a37216b2d64f38f408baa908318fd71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Walters Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:50:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Re: priorities for 0.13 --- e4/221f77133ead3358e0443a86b4f4a8404520d6 | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+) create mode 100644 e4/221f77133ead3358e0443a86b4f4a8404520d6 diff --git a/e4/221f77133ead3358e0443a86b4f4a8404520d6 b/e4/221f77133ead3358e0443a86b4f4a8404520d6 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d197f5c22 --- /dev/null +++ b/e4/221f77133ead3358e0443a86b4f4a8404520d6 @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A51431FAF + for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:50:48 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -1.098 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, + NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id aif39Qi4jRRG for ; + Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:50:48 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26117431FAE + for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:50:48 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) + by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) + (envelope-from ) + id 1SOa8m-00074S-Ii; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:50:42 +0100 +Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] + helo=localhost) + by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) + (envelope-from ) + id 1SOa8m-0007da-5p; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:50:40 +0100 +From: Mark Walters +To: David Bremner , notmuch +Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13 +In-Reply-To: <87ehr6fhtj.fsf@zancas.localnet> +References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87ehr6fhtj.fsf@zancas.localnet> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+128~g0f26d91 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:50:58 +0100 +Message-ID: <87397m5nbx.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 +X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) +X-QM-Body-MD5: 989a7ffea7fe0bf034b61ab27941433b (of first 20000 bytes) +X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 +X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - +X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to + determine if it is + spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. + This message scored -1.8 points. + Summary of the scoring: + * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, + * medium trust + * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] + * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail + provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) + * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + * domain + * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list +X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:50:49 -0000 + + +On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, David Bremner wrote: +> David Bremner writes: +> +>> Hi All; +>> +>> I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of +>> May. What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and +>> pushed for 0.13? +>> +> +> So here are some patches that people expressed interest in for 0.13, but +> need more review. +> +> id:"1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca" +> +> id:"1334431301-27303-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" +> +> id:"1335651473-19652-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu" +> +> Note that in particular it makes sense to push amdragon's changes while +> we are bumping the SONAME. +> +> The sequence by Jamie +> +> id:"1334429574-12918-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net" +> +> Has only one minor comment about a comment; I'm not sure it's enough for +> a rebase on it's own. Mark, what do you think? + +Hi + +I think Jamie already posted a patch with a nicer comment + +id:"1334436547-10260-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net" + +(ie that replaces 2/5 in the original series) + +In any case don't let the comment hold everything up: we can correct +that later if we care (and it does not matter to users) + +Best wishes + +Mark -- 2.26.2