From: Jeremy Nickurak Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:13:31 +0000 (+1800) Subject: Re: Better Gmail handling by not using Notmuch tags X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e65047a0f8786f8b2591b62b0cdb3b649cf6d727;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: Better Gmail handling by not using Notmuch tags --- diff --git a/5f/911986f38915b1cee0190b3697549cd0755b02 b/5f/911986f38915b1cee0190b3697549cd0755b02 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..72b3a165d --- /dev/null +++ b/5f/911986f38915b1cee0190b3697549cd0755b02 @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEA0431FAF + for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:13:35 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.699 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id FN2kpOsSFABu for ; + Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:13:34 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com + [209.85.217.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7590431FAE + for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:13:33 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by lbbgk1 with SMTP id gk1so2153010lbb.26 + for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:13:32 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=nickurak.ca; s=google-dkim; + h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date + :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; + bh=MwXpBrmuBOYPamg5BmaHITTTFhtkfc+gKtQFc+/Fw2M=; + b=Guli53EZTLHKWnMOWVzA/VVRNDimgwh5QLGstI3cwV22iIc3LlPhaD1mXk7BkWtJtG + 3+aySj2ifPOen/pvyvcFwXOcKBn3B0s+JuFeUGMx7l/Wf/72zw899UuP6S1oBfQdZ/Ua + TFDRqyyigURh89ZSZlpUVPIpdNw30q7bgVXMc= +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=google.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date + :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type + :x-gm-message-state; + bh=MwXpBrmuBOYPamg5BmaHITTTFhtkfc+gKtQFc+/Fw2M=; + b=NFQdFVIDL6fzf781ssx5mTwCBqVGlQNidKI0PDyv/y8OrJZKyCTI4YNuesUlDNHWwx + gcWJ0+4eitNvHPHvXupbMZn69rNAqu8noGKXw+ftIVEs5jBgFsh/hvxQDF2Md1O/XepT + aYYPZTv3laUkVb543NmI9Mdbhov93cO0EnhGbkA2EG7VXnR7BNBds1+1i4gOFjeYA07g + H4GHxlxvQdpgUO2TcGqXhJ176Q2VitQQYjke2bJzt9OWVCsovtWEjhM8UtUQWYxMUW0n + pGZjgaEZHCjIPt3Ng4EJhQ8LKsiZUO5nIw4AO1aqlAFv5ZhQCagFpqFriOj5ODTqlvVt + hsFQ== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.112.28.233 with SMTP id e9mr19921lbh.43.1347549211912; Thu, 13 + Sep 2012 08:13:31 -0700 (PDT) +Sender: jeremy@nickurak.ca +Received: by 10.114.17.200 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:13:31 -0700 (PDT) +X-Originating-IP: [68.148.28.35] +In-Reply-To: + +References: + +Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:13:31 -0600 +X-Google-Sender-Auth: kZMdMb4V0v32D4HqxV10CU_IHRA +Message-ID: + +Subject: Re: Better Gmail handling by not using Notmuch tags +From: Jeremy Nickurak +To: Damien Cassou +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec555549c17eb4704c996c0e3 +X-Gm-Message-State: + ALoCoQl0UoKoJD4TsGw9CxGiV2gJOsTI60KEvRsA8XjrPmr3aFna8wlI37VLlq6nofcCrjBgtWD5 +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:13:36 -0000 + +--bcaec555549c17eb4704c996c0e3 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +Gmail doesn't have folders, of course, it has labels, which are +approximately equivalent to notmuch tags. The key difference being that a +message can only be in one folder, but it can have multiple tags/labels. + +On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Damien Cassou wrote: + +> Hi, +> +> I'm a Gmail user and would like to keep using Gmail web interface in +> parallel to Notmuch. Basically, I would like Notmuch to mimic Gmail's +> behavior. In the notmuch mailing list, users proposed to convert Gmail +> folders to Notmuch tags and back (e.g., +> http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2012/009280.html). However, I +> didn't see any out-of-the-box full implementation of this proposal. +> +> Another solution would be to work directly with folders from Notmuch. +> Adding a Notmuch tag would just copy the current mail file to a +> different folder. Removing a tag would just remove the current mail +> file from the folder. Would such a solution work? What would I loose? +> +> Thank you +> +> -- +> Damien Cassou +> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st +> +> "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them +> popular by not having them." James Iry +> _______________________________________________ +> notmuch mailing list +> notmuch@notmuchmail.org +> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch +> + +--bcaec555549c17eb4704c996c0e3 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +Gmail doesn't have folders, of course, it has labels, which are approxi= +mately=C2=A0equivalent=C2=A0to notmuch tags. The key difference being that = +a message can only be in one folder, but it can have multiple tags/labels.<= +br>
+
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Damien Cassou <= +span dir=3D"ltr"><damien.cassou@gmail.com> wrote:
+Hi,
+
+I'm a Gmail user and would like to keep using Gmail web interface in +parallel to Notmuch. Basically, I would like Notmuch to mimic Gmail's +behavior. In the notmuch mailing list, users proposed to convert Gmail
+folders to Notmuch tags and back (e.g.,
+http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2012/009280.html)= +. However, I
+didn't see any out-of-the-box full implementation of this proposal.
+
+Another solution would be to work directly with folders from Notmuch.
+Adding a Notmuch tag would just copy the current mail file to a
+different folder. Removing a tag would just remove the current mail
+file from the folder. Would such a solution work? What would I loose?
+
+Thank you
+
+--
+Damien Cassou
+http://= +damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
+
+"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
+popular by not having them." James Iry
+_______________________________________________
+notmuch mailing list
+notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
+

+ +--bcaec555549c17eb4704c996c0e3--