From: David Bremner Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:13:35 +0000 (+2100) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e57ad7428a57abbcff6e097756b2194c02d45350;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs --- diff --git a/c9/2e9e35bffa493368c0342a80c18905e37ea36b b/c9/2e9e35bffa493368c0342a80c18905e37ea36b new file mode 100644 index 000000000..04fae2a57 --- /dev/null +++ b/c9/2e9e35bffa493368c0342a80c18905e37ea36b @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF77431FB6 + for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:13:42 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id C4ULgslHLU3A for ; + Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:13:41 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE8A1431FAF + for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:13:41 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net + ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet) + by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) + (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) + id 1SkGPc-0001sr-LY; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:13:40 -0300 +Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) + (envelope-from ) + id 1SkGPX-0005AZ-5Z; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:13:35 -0300 +From: David Bremner +To: Ethan , + Mark Walters +Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs +In-Reply-To: + +References: <1340656899-5644-1-git-send-email-ethan@betacantrips.com> + <877gutnmf1.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> + +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:13:35 -0300 +Message-ID: <87hatvlba8.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Spam_bar: - +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:13:42 -0000 + +Ethan writes: +> +> Yeah, I don't even know how an mbox message gets flagged read and I don't +> know how I would support it. +> + +I think read only access to mboxes is fine. Yes, somebody will be +unhappy, but the only convincing argument I have heard for mboxes or +similar formats is archival use. + +d