From: Suvayu Ali Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:53:53 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Re: notmuch search --output=files error with AND NOT search terms X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d4017a0fdc5b18578734a6aa24134c6fec5de5e4;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: notmuch search --output=files error with AND NOT search terms --- diff --git a/5b/8ac6f15bdff540cf2c62a7bce73b7ec1eea379 b/5b/8ac6f15bdff540cf2c62a7bce73b7ec1eea379 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..abd377018 --- /dev/null +++ b/5b/8ac6f15bdff540cf2c62a7bce73b7ec1eea379 @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBE6431FB6 + for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:54:06 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id mIBviX-DW-p3 for ; + Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:54:00 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-ee0-f52.google.com (mail-ee0-f52.google.com + [74.125.83.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client + certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id + D4AE9431FAE for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:53:59 -0700 + (PDT) +Received: by mail-ee0-f52.google.com with SMTP id c50so5505965eek.25 + for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:53:58 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references + :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to + :user-agent; bh=RxFZx0bLmZaqbUKGHxmicEzXGudHp/W/6/iqECaoRKI=; + b=H3lhAhzvAAfssBBTmiN6wfn9V+bH1mn5rPMK8LunH9WJn69xTPVgjvRDoD7qyHkJVn + Mo8GnECtsCcdG3YQGmnvTlsSnSEAPuMHkGHR4ihiqhbXwyn95pmjnJdo/R9XBWRFsIYR + T7g0KV+GKVMH3SFWRJpmAcPVaRJ+A60VRnuAuIuCZtaNtpU4fquieInk6cy4fZwYKndw + VFQUZ8YoMD8CgB6qpLIsejgfvwu8tyK5oySMLIUvyey5tKiARsrLCHC5FbAvclBlEg8A + j7dsyzbijQQQZBn0wv8qHB3MGVhFD+58HiSZBdUwyc2zx4e7j2ci/LKBgihe4OYURHJ/ + gmNA== +X-Received: by 10.14.177.196 with SMTP id d44mr40974041eem.35.1373543637224; + Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:53:57 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from kuru.dyndns-at-home.com + ([2001:610:120:3001:f2de:f1ff:fe37:c76c]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w43sm68470911eez.6.2013.07.11.04.53.55 + for + (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); + Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:53:56 -0700 (PDT) +Sender: suvayu ali +Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:53:53 +0200 +From: Suvayu Ali +To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: Re: notmuch search --output=files error with AND NOT search terms +Message-ID: <20130711115353.GA20266@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> +Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +References: <51DC0A16.5080704@2b1.de> <87mwpvd1fp.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> + <1373457313852-4028436.post@n3.nabble.com> + <20130710125911.GA7198@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> + <1373531960691-4028438.post@n3.nabble.com> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <1373531960691-4028438.post@n3.nabble.com> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:54:06 -0000 + +Hi Ingo, + +Disclaimer: I'm just a user, with almost no knowledge of notmuch +internals. + +On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 01:39:20AM -0700, ingo wrote: +> +> And both mails have the same message-id in the message header. +> +> Still, only one of both files really should be found with this search, so +> why is the out put different? + +If there are multiple copies of a message, I would expect --output=files +to show all the copies (files). I believe this is notmuch's way to +handle duplicate messages. I think the confusion arises from the notion +of treating unique message id, and not unique physical files as the +definition of a message. If you think a bit, seems reasonable too. + +Hope this helps, + +-- +Suvayu + +Open source is the future. It sets us free.