From: Andrei POPESCU Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:17:05 +0000 (+0300) Subject: notmuch and Debian's BTS/PTS [was: Re: [Joerg Jaspert] Bug#666027: notmuch: get a... X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bd7a6f97e1f19aa6a342a6e6486bc85f13cf0e86;p=notmuch-archives.git notmuch and Debian's BTS/PTS [was: Re: [Joerg Jaspert] Bug#666027: notmuch: get a quiet option] --- diff --git a/8c/cbed46d2065b5ba1b68951f7b41ec9b9038a0a b/8c/cbed46d2065b5ba1b68951f7b41ec9b9038a0a new file mode 100644 index 000000000..945eb8421 --- /dev/null +++ b/8c/cbed46d2065b5ba1b68951f7b41ec9b9038a0a @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BB4431FAF + for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:17:14 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id vvlE56XMv5pT for ; + Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:17:13 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com + [74.125.83.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client + certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id + 01D82431FAE for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:17:12 -0700 + (PDT) +Received: by eekb47 with SMTP id b47so1243212eek.26 + for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:17:10 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version + :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; + bh=DLeCNdMPG91iDl7hWViYYPntC4fG9blpMbLihJND7/0=; + b=FhTzsXkJT0tc4gL1z9P75dvwjnXZsEfnQACCrZcD25HeaGoeJUXwocriXDAiVM7JuE + C7KZydeeuZVPhSuF8en6tTMMcCPCcT3leSwMJjT9ycYbzLEY27mw+i1wjG79/d16IHe2 + qjSghOUgWjOAeyBg7GVdxuIYE0comAqyfwlQTPnE/xTPIGFdR2EAm9oOb95CtmFDVtqo + /EHRYTnwn7uM1nuuXkCBZOxrttka9sx9SYZm9qlEi71nmD+U5xcaMu843vQ37O/3rRUm + Wt4e4MqIVWsn+KaP65RjEjt4QwRUoITmu+y3PexBndlSZldZtH1NIsbYFF12v3jrU6hi + 4OGQ== +Received: by 10.180.91.10 with SMTP id ca10mr4604258wib.17.1333019829990; + Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:17:09 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from sid.nuvreauspam ([92.86.142.199]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n20sm16183464wiw.5.2012.03.29.04.17.07 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); + Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:17:08 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by sid.nuvreauspam (Postfix, from userid 1077) + id C460FC037F; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:17:05 +0300 (EEST) +Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:17:05 +0300 +From: Andrei POPESCU +To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Subject: notmuch and Debian's BTS/PTS [was: Re: [Joerg Jaspert] Bug#666027: + notmuch: get a quiet option] +Message-ID: <20120329111705.GU4122@sid.nuvreauspam> +References: <87ty19pi85.fsf@zancas.localnet> + <87vcloshss.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> + <87limjpufs.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lX3hbvz5zFyKlV8s" +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <87limjpufs.fsf@zancas.localnet> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:17:15 -0000 + + +--lX3hbvz5zFyKlV8s +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Jo, 29 mar 12, 07:34:15, David Bremner wrote: +> We could give it a try and see how it works. I suspect it needs the +> assistance of one of the notmuch list moderators (which I understand we +> have delegates for as of a few days ago) to get the BTS able to send to +> the list. Any Debian savvy volunteers to sort this out? + +If there's something I can do... + +Does it make sense to subscribe the list to PTS[1] instead? I'd say the=20 +bts, bts-control, buildd, default and contact keywords[2] make sense. + +[1] Package Tracking System +[2] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/resources.html#p= +kg-tracking-system + +Kind regards, +Andrei +--=20 +If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. +(Albert Einstein) + +--lX3hbvz5zFyKlV8s +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" +Content-Description: Digital signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- +Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) + +iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPdESxAAoJEHNWs3jeoi3pWKoH/1p0p38FmMZNQ5bfz4NhGjHK +Nw8y0MwG7NUMSrBBzmgBJzAhZbR42wfcsyXMn6QZBAhUzM0ReFoDYncBRuq/5BSR +C9drodQNobPCu2CpjB58HTpokHxKXUiyPb6ABsNawk8KAAyD/r7DWIUjOcILTZAK +nOTznYM96zeug4YrgsqAiNCvZU5T48Rf/8hgh04+8bb1oTkxI297Fe4XsDofar4C +0xwVVTGbmJVYrPum2cdEyxWcXJ6K+GhFoQUztbqwnV8OrDI1e8TXBxRdOFm7aTLr +BrPBjqFcJ3FlOab62plXnMiZa3z0BAvuBWk1sXbI+uNOOiKf0u1qpoUImHayj7w= +=XXZv +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--lX3hbvz5zFyKlV8s--