From: Taesoo Kim Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 04:41:28 +0000 (+2000) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] automatic tagging based on imap maildir X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=aa2e497a77e9834c9498ffcfd7ec70958da62567;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: [PATCH 0/2] automatic tagging based on imap maildir --- diff --git a/4e/0689623cd756c01c3953c6b7256a9c7e749239 b/4e/0689623cd756c01c3953c6b7256a9c7e749239 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9cc97a630 --- /dev/null +++ b/4e/0689623cd756c01c3953c6b7256a9c7e749239 @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45147431FAF + for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:40:12 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 3B0Xb5enVpfZ for ; + Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:40:10 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com + [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EA5C431FAE + for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:40:10 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x40so1955914qcp.26 + for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:40:08 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version + :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding + :in-reply-to:user-agent; + bh=rKvMDc+Fd9YKkhT/uxMgWQXJCJVqHhTd9fdP4corArc=; + b=KMgYDZ67DvWyTVqMH+oLL3B88LUqOqg05VqFDa59+j32dAztHKg83H7Yc3lxDyBBvd + +lSSPzM5MDzNhNX8DugwpJS2sPxxvuMBITj0js2adOxGkFYnIzwas9YgSGc6J/SlrJUT + HF4kOpGtw/qi5lBJkof2SAf4xPPVizG94yTQ6RCmPcdBtf22CD508LpL8/GthQtRFTmY + 5e9Lg03OR5KqD/dRfx8kLow15u8c95gxZBBF5vWv6OMPufL1FMURee6T7HcGMYzzF4Mx + 7UtQxSPcHGxgyQDAHL0DI8BdNUrpx3SSt0gym0qiYhGu7H4PK+wKVpwMGuQGjbEhHXkW + pbeA== +Received: by 10.49.71.4 with SMTP id q4mr1563918qeu.16.1351312808715; + Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:40:08 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from skynet ([18.111.17.19]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ga9sm2184588qab.22.2012.10.26.21.40.06 + (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:40:08 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by skynet (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 27 Oct 2012 00:41:28 + -0400 +Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 00:41:28 -0400 +From: Taesoo Kim +To: David Bremner +Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] automatic tagging based on imap maildir +Message-ID: <20121027044128.GB12051@taesoo.org> +References: <1351208039-32293-1-git-send-email-taesoo@mit.edu> + <20121026171024.30658.84119@localhost> + <877gqc7s67.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit +In-Reply-To: <877gqc7s67.fsf@zancas.localnet> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:12:04 -0700 +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Taesoo Kim +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 04:40:12 -0000 + +It seems afew can be used for converting gmail labels to notmuch +tags. After spending 10 min on google search, I decided to implement +what I wanted to have -- also my lab mates wanted to too. So you guys +think it's duplicated, just ignore these patches :) + +Thanks for notmuch. We all loved notmuch. +Taesoo + +On 10/26/12 at 08:02pm, David Bremner wrote: +> Amadeusz Żołnowski writes: +> +> > Is this what Teythoon's afew [0] does (and lots more)? +> > +> > [0] https://github.com/teythoon/afew/ +> +> Perhaps this is obvious to everyone, but just in case. Even if a patch +> series did duplicate exactly functionality in afew (and I don't know +> whether it does or not), we still might want to include the +> functionality in core notmuch. +> +> d