From: Peter Wang Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 01:07:45 +0000 (+1100) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] cli: support Mail-Followup-To: in notmuch reply X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a784e0ff799e27a3c2026205df45ae4f5ca5456e;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] cli: support Mail-Followup-To: in notmuch reply --- diff --git a/23/fe5da36f252e3c8249099d381b95fa1c74a1e5 b/23/fe5da36f252e3c8249099d381b95fa1c74a1e5 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cf265f82e --- /dev/null +++ b/23/fe5da36f252e3c8249099d381b95fa1c74a1e5 @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC1B431FBD + for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:07:52 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id qgHu2+Cpxj8M for ; + Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:07:52 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com (mail-pb0-f45.google.com + [209.85.160.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F99431FAF + for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:07:51 -0800 (PST) +Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ro8so2432653pbb.18 + for ; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:07:51 -0800 (PST) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=x-received:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to + :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition + :content-transfer-encoding; + bh=Yw6jyLo4T2qD9BVoK5vTGA7MbZRztmxMk/xN4JbaQhc=; + b=uVXkRGa3fw0MlQtFGHhbUE43WFbtGoesRYX3bq2MeeL6Ilde9Bwyw+Dv9oby2iW0mc + 4Hjq5Ohb8p592zdotM7HzQ15fA9WqT0KveT0hR603fRvdx2xZB75w6Rqodo93Ty+WRMP + awVxOkVd1Z6U+lS5P6PVjo1mac8N21eIFPWNV2Wsz+qRbmsPry7PMuFQGM0ivI/Bodg7 + npRvol6pISOEDxowm/FauztuvbaZh0Lnebloc/AycmHzEiRlCz9qaIF5YP7MHKOkkCaP + ZPL3UGeyjz08EMpv2xM5FazJ2mv/L7+GB04tj52NrxGeBq1XjKcCsWuEsESkFV6ZGkW3 + d4tg== +X-Received: by 10.66.4.193 with SMTP id m1mr25243093pam.214.1362272871134; + Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:07:51 -0800 (PST) +Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au. + [220.233.42.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id + rr14sm17045838pbb.34.2013.03.02.17.07.48 + (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); + Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:07:49 -0800 (PST) +Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:07:45 +1100 +Message-ID: <20130303120745.GA4884@hili.localdomain> +From: Peter Wang +To: Jani Nikula +Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] cli: support Mail-Followup-To: in notmuch reply +In-Reply-To: + +References: + <5eaa3acc22ee5513bdce5ab931b7a79ade880e06.1362254104.git.jani@nikula.org> + +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 01:07:52 -0000 + +On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 21:55:21 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: +> Use Mail-Followup-To header to determine recipients according to +> http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html if configured and present in the +> message being replied to. + +I would like to see an option to --reply-to=list that, as far as +possible, does the right thing. If we had that, do we need +reply.honor_followup_to? + +Peter