From: Jani Nikula Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:29:10 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Re: gmail label support patch available for oflineimap X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=87c274d6323a3fc8ae06bbf95c653b62d47b1e4f;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: gmail label support patch available for oflineimap --- diff --git a/df/ef01310f8603fb25c20af3f82ae149b682e260 b/df/ef01310f8603fb25c20af3f82ae149b682e260 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..afe9b1375 --- /dev/null +++ b/df/ef01310f8603fb25c20af3f82ae149b682e260 @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA120431FAF + for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:12 -0800 (PST) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.699 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id BL+--t8SEjLT for ; + Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:12 -0800 (PST) +Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com + [209.85.214.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F2AC431FAE + for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:12 -0800 (PST) +Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id oi10so1307158obb.26 + for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=google.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to + :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; + bh=/2/FnH4eE+71wfLTbIyFh4EFDbTzAm7EpB20GDoUde8=; + b=XTS1HuMhDJ7zd6hNCLzRf/udmwy6DZE0mqxLOlu+Ar+mZqEU4OmD1esWhc2Q1mSo12 + Ifhf1NDwH2hvuR9SsrruChaBKIDyxIJv88jODPq9oYP00JJ1lxy3FvmEy357h3xaOZcn + skJZ/FOB0UJ3bgPlp2y09DcHo4R6Ktd8qhOff0fXQx/QXkhhqHHIffZf8jTIuSgajFNT + T6+1uo70jLF5t/pGKkUJ1F5SS71zbz91S4FPR2Pf8QAQ7jxJE4x37tJRbcRbtbyskwx1 + jC8y2sUbkHVJQUeVMdEcxL7E/IpHsOc8oxEayhiqqDVb4/DP6ha4/Qfsh41T8toxncBN + Xujw== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.182.95.133 with SMTP id dk5mr2852403obb.14.1354102150634; Wed, + 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST) +Received: by 10.76.69.138 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST) +Received: by 10.76.69.138 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:29:10 -0800 (PST) +In-Reply-To: + +References: <87zk24ctko.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> + <50B3871B.2050509@gmail.com> <87r4ngcl00.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> + <50B48627.9040409@gmail.com> + + + + <50B5BDFF.1080802@gmail.com> + +Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:29:10 +0200 +Message-ID: + +Subject: Re: gmail label support patch available for oflineimap +From: Jani Nikula +To: Felipe Contreras +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988 +X-Gm-Message-State: + ALoCoQklvfDDxB+JlbXp72sjzVzQl6HP1Z2WjqpK6VK3qH8AMAaOHH8JRBRAz+CY8OgjSJhszYYW +Cc: Notmuch Mail , Rainer@krugs.de +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:29:12 -0000 + +--14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +On Nov 28, 2012 12:10 PM, "Felipe Contreras" +wrote: +> +> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: +> +> >> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is +terrible idea, since this +> >> would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do. +> > +> > My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding +gmail / other server +> > communication is not the best idea. +> +> And I disagree. + +Which part do you disagree with, before or after "and", or both? Care to +elaborate, in either case? Any concrete suggestions? + +BR, +Jani. + +--14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 + +


+On Nov 28, 2012 12:10 PM, "Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
+>
+> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com> wrote:
+>
+> >> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is terrible idea, since this
+> >> would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do.
+> >
+> > My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding gmail / other server
+> > communication is not the best idea.
+>
+> And I disagree.

+

Which part do you disagree with, before or after "and", or both? Care to elaborate, in either case? Any concrete suggestions?

+

BR,
+Jani.
+

+ +--14dae93b62a2ad9c1f04cf8c7988--