From: Peter Wang Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 01:59:51 +0000 (+1000) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7c4f6d4ed897dbe06585c050d3847282b7534b90;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers --- diff --git a/70/1196138797ef98a6b953c2605f5eca59dedb48 b/70/1196138797ef98a6b953c2605f5eca59dedb48 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1801fabc5 --- /dev/null +++ b/70/1196138797ef98a6b953c2605f5eca59dedb48 @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30553431FAF + for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 19:00:01 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.799 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id z9YbuXoMZAoX for ; + Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:59:59 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-gh0-f181.google.com (mail-gh0-f181.google.com + [209.85.160.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E6D431FAE + for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:59:59 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by ghbz13 with SMTP id z13so7825188ghb.26 + for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:59:57 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references + :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition + :content-transfer-encoding; + bh=sQPt2vi55FlsamtfihEH1v7Tl2NPoZJlZcpCIWK8drg=; + b=eOcGgeo6TUDiTQ8IKStmjxcDe4KTFU7LY9RCRTyxam2VxMQhYk6VG0q3HuZgP/OfXC + xeFKDMWEeito0w/8cMWSMuqiqLxe4J7h2Yn+TNJedx3TgmK4yJ0sgqcKelv8amHgul54 + /v+QoyGjxJvg/NGAL2EJWmjsGMK5IZ9u9HyiPISfTea9l0HkUCp5z3LLskTgvl2IdTOV + BSB22B64cfxsKxwE4nKfHFD2VuRxP7QKVLzRReYoiAbIQchd+sOmUMssYvc4/wFwViR9 + jE1i8eboP23+X8OZDIRL2FMk53URVWAdtu0A+rhTty9m36KHcPRzAhATJEcpcL86tIkb + f1LA== +Received: by 10.68.194.201 with SMTP id hy9mr4165191pbc.69.1341367197232; + Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:59:57 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au. + [220.233.42.215]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id of1sm16662864pbb.15.2012.07.03.18.59.54 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); + Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:59:56 -0700 (PDT) +Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:59:51 +1000 +Message-ID: <20120704115951.GC2342@hili.localdomain> +From: Peter Wang +To: Jameson Graef Rollins +Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers +In-Reply-To: <87vci471tw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +References: <1340508470-16606-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> + <1340508470-16606-2-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> + <87vci471tw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:00:01 -0000 + +On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:27:23 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: +> On Sat, Jun 23 2012, Peter Wang wrote: +> > Output Reply-To headers when present in a message. +> > These were missing in text and json output formats. +> +> I don't see why the Reply-To header is needed, given that we are +> constructing reply templates, but I guess if someone thinks it's needed +> I don't see much harm in including it. + +I want to see what the sender intended, before hitting reply. + +Peter