From: Blake Jones <blakej@foo.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:52:03 +0000 (+1600)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] install: check for non-SysV version (Solaris support)
X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=580afe66e46bd42a0f39ed5ad7c75ae788befda0;p=notmuch-archives.git

Re: [PATCH 05/10] install: check for non-SysV version (Solaris support)
---

diff --git a/96/b93c7ce557a2c41c711b361ca0692c3c42e552 b/96/b93c7ce557a2c41c711b361ca0692c3c42e552
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e4048d617
--- /dev/null
+++ b/96/b93c7ce557a2c41c711b361ca0692c3c42e552
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+Return-Path: <blakej@foo.net>
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB4E431FB6
+	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Nov 2012 06:52:08 -0800 (PST)
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: 0
+X-Spam-Level: 
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
+	autolearn=disabled
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
+	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+	with ESMTP id n59Nm1PznLf0 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
+	Mon,  5 Nov 2012 06:52:07 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from foo.net (70-36-235-136.dsl.static.sonic.net [70.36.235.136])
+	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
+	(No client certificate requested)
+	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 911B3431FAE
+	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Nov 2012 06:52:07 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from foo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+	by foo.net (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA5Eq3Ei020189;
+	Mon, 5 Nov 2012 06:52:04 -0800 (PST)
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] install: check for non-SysV version (Solaris
+	support) 
+In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:29:23 +0100."
+	<87fw4oxp7w.fsf@nikula.org> 
+Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 06:52:03 -0800
+Message-ID: <20188.1352127123@foo.net>
+From: Blake Jones <blakej@foo.net>
+X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2
+	(foo.net [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 05 Nov 2012 06:52:05 -0800 (PST)
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
+	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
+	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
+	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:52:08 -0000
+
+> On Mon, 05 Nov 2012, Blake Jones <blakej@foo.net> wrote:
+> >> > +INSTALL="install"
+> >> > +printf "Checking for working \"install\" program... "
+> >> > +mkdir _tmp_
+> >> 
+> >> This doesn't feel like a hot idea.
+> >
+> > Out of curiosity, why not?
+> 
+> Note that I'm only referring to creating temp directories like this to
+> check for the install tool compatibility; otherwise I'm fine with the
+> general approach.
+
+Sure.  But what's wrong with creating a temp directory?  The configure
+script creates plenty of temp files for testing compiler features and
+library symbol availability.
+
+Blake