From: David Bremner Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:46:59 +0000 (+2100) Subject: Re: Can't compile notmuch-delivery X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=56b0952d0272afc7afff592728c4591a5e88fb39;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: Can't compile notmuch-delivery --- diff --git a/e7/40427a161e7f0acbf9962ed8ddb5c4250f0c9c b/e7/40427a161e7f0acbf9962ed8ddb5c4250f0c9c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..47bcfd75e --- /dev/null +++ b/e7/40427a161e7f0acbf9962ed8ddb5c4250f0c9c @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1429431FC4 + for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:47:12 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: 0 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id cYzD-sdb4XFd for ; + Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:47:12 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) + (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC46431FAF + for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:47:12 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net + ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet) + by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) + (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) + id 1SaWsK-0006g8-KE; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:47:04 -0300 +Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) + (envelope-from ) + id 1SaWsF-0003ea-9d; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:46:59 -0300 +From: David Bremner +To: Jameson Graef Rollins , + Felipe Contreras , + "Justus Winter" <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> +Subject: Re: Can't compile notmuch-delivery +In-Reply-To: <87mx4mvqch.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +References: <20120531214259.GA18272@desktop> + + + <87lik7171d.fsf@zancas.localnet> + <87sjefufub.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> + <874nqu28y1.fsf@zancas.localnet> + <87mx4mvqch.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> +User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 + (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) +Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:46:59 -0300 +Message-ID: <87sjeezx7g.fsf@zancas.localnet> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +X-Spam_bar: - +Cc: Ali Polatel , notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:47:13 -0000 + +Jameson Graef Rollins writes: + +> I think the zeroth-order thing we have to do then is to have the build +> include the bindings as well. Then everyone will be able to see +> immediately if the bindings are broken. I wouldn't even make it an +> option, or make it an option to exclude building the bindings rather +> than to include. + +OK, I can agree with this. Can we get some help from the bindings +maintainers (or other interested people) in getting this working? +Probably configure should detect/decide what bindings to build. + +d