From: Ethan Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:43:04 +0000 (+2000) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs X-Git-Url: http://git.tremily.us/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=24c18ba9e81046d1abb344b8a78d4e8643ba5870;p=notmuch-archives.git Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs --- diff --git a/d5/ce5276a12cbf73605da0fd0abcdfa1ae731a09 b/d5/ce5276a12cbf73605da0fd0abcdfa1ae731a09 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ff34c59bc --- /dev/null +++ b/d5/ce5276a12cbf73605da0fd0abcdfa1ae731a09 @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +Return-Path: +X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806C7431FB6 + for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:43:05 -0700 (PDT) +X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -0.798 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, + FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] + autolearn=disabled +Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id GRqhHwBP9nxI for ; + Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:43:04 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com + [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) + (No client certificate requested) + by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF67431FAF + for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:43:04 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by vbbfc26 with SMTP id fc26so2425761vbb.26 + for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:43:04 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to + :cc:content-type; + bh=f+igHKmLBkJaGVzbX+/JokcAy7Ixy2ddI6yDlJThcLY=; + b=knddrBa8QJ+HYV2+vnS8Th8mfDrNi4QMbw3mJ78exagDTa09iIXE9gZaPkw9SNtEha + JraZ/h4CYdrR1sn4wbErwSd+JatmsJaTsORrKMvjC9q8g64tHzOHC/ISMjeouy8MmKnB + 4+v0tB57NhJTs7FoWKU/ES1lAIZJujGMvFQeh1N06PDSzqchCkvoavF2YOxBbRB7t5QW + vOEHoDij0LGwmp+cDGZjOfZKjSNOBOwLpfYWBf7IDdpgx2zrtOCBUvkXHR6c6oxuSS+L + XCDifHBSmozCO0q7B3YcbAuFOdaQGa28q8v4M6Dali0hXmTw+5fzIUgcJNRfw868JdF6 + cXBw== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.52.17.207 with SMTP id q15mr172738vdd.49.1340952184088; Thu, + 28 Jun 2012 23:43:04 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.220.6.3 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:43:03 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <87bok3m70p.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +References: <1340656899-5644-1-git-send-email-ethan@betacantrips.com> + <87bok3m70p.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> +Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:43:04 -0400 +Message-ID: + +Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs +From: Ethan +To: Mark Walters +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5040a4c97e99b04c396c281 +Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 +Precedence: list +List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." + +List-Unsubscribe: , + +List-Archive: +List-Post: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: , + +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:43:05 -0000 + +--bcaec5040a4c97e99b04c396c281 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 + +On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Mark Walters wrote: + +> +> Just a quick question: does this update the database with +> maildir://files URIs instead of just filenames? In other words is it +> safe to try out on actual mailstores? +> + +It doesn't change any of the existing filenames or do anything like a +database "upgrade". If you run notmuch new, it should add a URI-based +filename to each message, but I don't think it should remove old filenames, +so I would expect it to be fine. But I didn't expect anyone to try it on +their actual mail database. + +(I used it on a trial system but when I reverted to master some things +> seemed to stop working) +> + +Sorry for breaking it :) + +Ethan + +--bcaec5040a4c97e99b04c396c281 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
+
+Just a quick question: does this update the database with
+maildir://files URIs instead of just filenames? In other words is it
+safe to try out on actual mailstores?

It doesn'= +;t change any of the existing filenames or do anything like a database &quo= +t;upgrade". If you run notmuch new, it should add a URI-based filename= + to each message, but I don't think it should remove old filenames, so = +I would expect it to be fine. But I didn't expect anyone to try it on t= +heir actual mail database.
+
+ +(I used it on a trial system but when I reverted to master some things
+seemed to stop working)

Sorry for breaking it :)
Ethan

+ +--bcaec5040a4c97e99b04c396c281--