--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEF2431FDB\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id kS2pFcAl16Px for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com\r
+ [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03901431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so3224695lah.26\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version\r
+ :content-type:x-gm-message-state;\r
+ bh=Yin5tsVABDXxqRm3Mm/CG93eDWr41Si69XIY8QLJNHw=;\r
+ b=cuS6/J2Vugt9qTX+3S0ZxIWJbkM2PJavS+TnwwVVGYsljavLltTKaKMXw5nnHADDef\r
+ Wgborc9YE/a+RfUkV9psnZLlGmZIvbUL6m6J04qM8Mw3LwrhHJlw/PzBx9wcQv9ZsTw5\r
+ HiR8gnrKVOWWke+Ad5oaC/+5WGydpVR5ERGYmxCEhcLp1l9hNc7Oz6kqgNLHNwR9iT8d\r
+ kq+bybMxbAZBtBrvsAgSbUZDkSySFI6yVbUHDJZXA2VcN4JRu98gtnrXu3oPzJICbcQr\r
+ aMO/1MIDmJZVOew74UWoG4sMS2MWkXA/JTXFf5x1epM5LNA0U7KMWY1tOjrumKG+JGbm\r
+ di1A==\r
+Received: by 10.112.42.41 with SMTP id k9mr2736041lbl.96.1334440565393;\r
+ Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe50dc00-68.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
+ [80.220.80.68])\r
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id mm11sm13974042lab.2.2012.04.14.14.56.03\r
+ (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+ Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: new mua mailto: URI handler\r
+In-Reply-To: <87bomuf1i5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+References: <1327865624-7673-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+ <1327865624-7673-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+ <87hawmyt8k.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <87wr5idprb.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+ <87bomucaq3.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <87r4vqdn5k.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+ <87bomuf1i5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>User-Agent:\r
+ Notmuch/0.12+81~g839a805 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+ (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:56:01 +0300\r
+Message-ID: <87lilydlla.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQkj8n1fhJIv/tZQ67DEhMtdu9FtxCRL60wHPucG3k/Z7DliEI3+R0tX0wgtyTevWMJZ6tYD\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:56:07 -0000\r
+\r
+Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:\r
+\r
+> On Sat, Apr 14 2012, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+>> I was doing this purely based on whether the patches apply or not.\r
+>\r
+> I'm so sorry, Jani. You are correct that this patch requires a small\r
+> rebase fix to apply to master. I'm not sure how I missed it previously.\r
+\r
+No problem. Thanks for checking again; I was worried we might have a bug\r
+somewhere. :)\r
+\r
+Jani.\r