--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <phil@hands.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC97431FB6\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:10:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.01\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=unavailable\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id Kv-mHAzp8hqg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:10:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from free.hands.com (free.hands.com [83.142.228.128])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5049431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:10:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from hands.com (poker.hands-vpn [172.23.32.10])\r
+ by free.hands.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 75D4C2A615;\r
+ Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:09:47 +0100 (BST)\r
+Received: from phil by hands.com with local (masqmail 0.2.30) id\r
+ 1SkHDR-7NA-00; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:05:09 +0100\r
+From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>\r
+To: Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
+ Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
+ Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)\r
+In-Reply-To: <87ehozmpcq.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+References: <1340815565-21083-1-git-send-email-cworth@cworth.org>\r
+ <87obo4zljq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <87hatwqoz9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87ehozmpcq.fsf@jhu.edu>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:05:00 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87hatv4e37.fsf@poker.hands.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+ micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-hands-com-MailScanner-ID: 75D4C2A615.00000\r
+X-hands-com-MailScanner: Found to be clean\r
+X-hands-com-MailScanner-From: phil@hands.com\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:10:21 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu> writes:\r
+\r
+...\r
+> If it's not obvious, I'm pretty strongly against Carl's roll-back. I\r
+> could, of course, just uncomment my old correction in my .emacs, but I\r
+> think it's a change that could hurt users. Those who are more likely to\r
+> prefer the reply-all behavior are more likely to be able to change the\r
+> defaults. Those who aren't likely to change the defaults are more likely\r
+> to be bitten, badly, by a default reply-all behavior.\r
+\r
+I find the change to the new (only reply to sender) behaviour serously\r
+irritating, because it seems I cannot train myself to hit R all the time\r
+(which is pretty much what I always want).\r
+\r
+On the other hand, I'm perfectly capable of customising this, but have\r
+something of a fetish for at least trying to live with defaults for a\r
+period, so it's my own fault for putting up with it.\r
+\r
+So, even if I don't personally like it this way round, it is at least\r
+fail-safe (well except for the fact that I keep failing to group-reply\r
+and then wonder why nobody talks to me any more ;-)\r
+\r
+Of course, if it turns out that the vast majority of actual users are\r
+like me and would prefer to do r and then edit the To/Cc if it's\r
+supposed to be private, then reverting the change would make sense.\r
+\r
+Cheers, Phil.\r
+\r
+P.S. Oh ARSE! -- of course I just failed to hit R again! and so had to\r
+do some more sodding about to actually get the list included in the To:\r
+\r
+Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of\r
+letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having\r
+some key binding to add the rest of the recipients in the group, or flip\r
+between the two options so one can change one's mind after typing up the\r
+reply?\r
+=2D-=20\r
+|)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/\r
+|-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://www.uk.debian.org/\r
+|(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJP7ICsAAoJENBLo6ABJdXAENAP/12OPGQJoRPyB1wORGiw0klZ\r
+H/KU8IKi09Wfsj4Xxb/I8zdSL/J3v23lZOWjbAxH1L91WVxd4/UFSelC5oxPkzXg\r
++PKy6xiD+7vDpbAU/s1XOspsA2U59UgIT2QoKmniMNZw9Vehos+lCRKSVC6tKsKV\r
+vViL3hlgOOoRie+rmc+ck/4tnb8ckFVv7GxJWEuHvMuc5ZpG+OejSo6H04hC34s1\r
+u484PHWmadz9VtQauHDFXIWfmyReav+Ax2T4NShQi86/vrPNxB9lLjqyRNAnp8Uq\r
+mm9uDvzP8ZIEelsG4dqmweWwutU6cpVB+Hp3yVyyGZmaUX0xfkhQPXAbjYPhDGtC\r
+qECJxVN1QCeIOxBCIOa6JBiujOqnKoq/HC85vKDF14pgbAEqxBPx43ImnJg5tWeX\r
+Vgbtm+Cj2NPaga7FWSBdUgVzdaIW+T6SYZ7niYJYmpbxQh1TwZzbsEB3ANQPIsx6\r
+8IMx4uKpBEfm7Tr2yw+/yysxzCia3liyD7mhkDcI5w4AgMleXH8ij6mBNX2KULaq\r
+vWJvy8k6aQXKkOYbc2pc1F66mp7jw345dcHk8kJpyKeDf68Ci0DNIVqyTN3VFdue\r
+r/49UyBqPgy6juSKWDVaEZxQ5/cl5OVvBuLmMO+K27RQV5LfPR0A5SNsaU0LzvWk\r
+OAUJnUyhiSchetrHAa7n\r
+=iESM\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / commitdiff