Re: [RFC] Split notmuch_database_close into two functions

diff --git a/b6/164cfff03af33363283728c4753e6035e5e00b b/b6/164cfff03af33363283728c4753e6035e5e00b
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ec5f2ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/b6/164cfff03af33363283728c4753e6035e5e00b
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12218431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:56:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id pbn-sAaZidiK for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:56:53 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B98431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:56:53 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501)\r
+       id C787868055; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:56:47 +0300 (EEST)\r
+From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
+To: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>,\r
+       Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@googlemail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [RFC] Split notmuch_database_close into two functions\r
+In-Reply-To: <20120416214554.15615.86242@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>\r
+References:\r
+ <1332291311-28954-1-git-send-email-4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>\r
+       <20120401032323.GH5949@mit.edu>\r
+       <20120412090533.2074.78211@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>\r
+       <20120412165744.GF13549@mit.edu>        <20120413083358.13321.66680@megatron>\r
+       <20120416214554.15615.86242@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+113~gde05574 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
+X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
+       $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
+       !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
+Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:56:47 +0300\r
+Message-ID: <m24nsjufao.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Cc: notmuch mailing list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 04:56:57 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, Apr 17 2012, Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:\r
+\r
+> Hi everyone,\r
+>\r
+> Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-04-13 10:33:58)\r
+>> Quoting Austin Clements (2012-04-01 04:23:23)\r
+>> >Maybe you could describe your use case in more detail?\r
+>> \r
+>> Quoting Austin Clements (2012-04-12 17:57:44)\r
+>> >Quoth Justus Winter on Apr 12 at 11:05 am:\r
+>> ...\r
+>> >I see.  TL;DR\r
+>> \r
+>> .. which should pretty much settle Austins opinion on\r
+>> libnotmuch users being second class citizens.\r
+>\r
+> Na, I think you misinterpreted Austin here, I think he summarized his\r
+> position. Looking back at my mail I think I came across a lot harsher\r
+> than necessary, I'm sorry for that. Let's get back to the issue at\r
+> hand, shall we?\r
+>\r
+> Both Austin and Mark seem to support the split, any other opinions?\r
+\r
+I support it too (as did earlyer). Do we already have pushable series\r
+or is there a need for a new one ? It would be good to have this done\r
+so that application writers can start relying this being available\r
+in "official" notmuch (in 0.13 -- SONAME updated -- any other patches\r
+pending requiring SONAME bump to be reviewed ?).\r
+\r
+>\r
+> Cheers,\r
+> Justus\r
+\r
+Tomi\r