Re: priorities for 0.13

diff --git a/b1/dc2c7dfcc9a4af7e29c072dbebbaaae4d3b809 b/b1/dc2c7dfcc9a4af7e29c072dbebbaaae4d3b809
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2e63cd2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/b1/dc2c7dfcc9a4af7e29c072dbebbaaae4d3b809
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+Return-Path: <awg@xvx.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C292431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 6kNsriF9Vysd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9400B431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so60842lah.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date\r
+       :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type\r
+       :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;\r
+       bh=aoXEABLs8/v5CbCZxTt4kBxbi/PsaBkxt/o7fSzVYJA=;\r
+       b=QkeXA1DiLyafQoGcHzHBa6vif4vN/94vxCZnZazLxwzxEp+cjwxhC+IS41O5De5K84\r
+       ZOwp4YFeYF0UWV0gDPHhhYlY4fbWzfzdEBhBc2yOUNWAv/Be5/Us3PJqQavJ55R8fKua\r
+       B7KHAZTOBavzGTc29YYfpwxMrde2JOGJ5iovQZ4ii7cgsgiHOuVucTYgN/tm5vOhDPEL\r
+       1+S+15vxy+wCpOkNnpzyxlNY/iT0NWGvSQ6aa/6wLszjGAbAs9SReQqEYy+V2CVGFyOJ\r
+       1EvdZCTZHtJ9kIUjUbE/iO5dAJs0NjuhVqQO5/tRPw3AT/Y66Tiv6iC8B92BQ60rO64q\r
+       5zEg==\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.112.28.10 with SMTP id x10mr1270589lbg.41.1335357979579; Wed,\r
+       25 Apr 2012 05:46:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Sender: awg@xvx.ca\r
+Received: by 10.112.23.39 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:46:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56]\r
+In-Reply-To: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:46:19 -0600\r
+X-Google-Sender-Auth: LgFcMzo0o4OikPi-J5dMzH9GfOo\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAMoJFUsi5xAX4e2eeSd_jC6-u-VD9o_t511Ce1eGHMqMaqe3xA@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13\r
+From: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQn62s06nGRmCsuooaA+gqld4YFGP/XKF0b9ecVuektDTeCDPYE7C0ZSAmnHid1UMugery9I\r
+Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:46:24 -0000\r
+\r
+Hi David,\r
+\r
+On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:31, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
+> I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of\r
+> May. =A0What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and\r
+> pushed for 0.13?\r
+\r
+I would like to get the HTML reply series [1] in before 0.13, since\r
+otherwise the reply stuff that's already pushed can cause some ugly\r
+(but not buggy) behavior, quoting raw HTML in reply. There's been one\r
+review, and it's a small patch, but I think it could use another set\r
+of eyes.\r
+\r
+[1] id:"1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca"\r
+\r
+-- Adam\r