Re: [PATCH] emacs: add default value to notmuch-search-line-faces

diff --git a/6e/4121de6e871d9796688b31c4ae9a5a4484a92a b/6e/4121de6e871d9796688b31c4ae9a5a4484a92a
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c54281c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/6e/4121de6e871d9796688b31c4ae9a5a4484a92a
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C508429E5B\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:12:11 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id HR04AOHiu8Sz for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:12:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42BFE429E34\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:12:10 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by lahd3 with SMTP id d3so3349354lah.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:12:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by 10.152.112.41 with SMTP id in9mr11022865lab.27.1328015527214;\r
+       Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:12:07 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe50f800-253.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
+       [84.248.80.253])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w6sm17073009lbu.9.2012.01.31.05.12.04\r
+       (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:12:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: add default value to notmuch-search-line-faces\r
+In-Reply-To: <87liounn1g.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+References: <1327605679-15213-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org>\r
+       <20120126194146.GG1940@mit.edu> <87liounn1g.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+129~gf08c502 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:12:02 +0200\r
+Message-ID: <87vcns10f1.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:12:11 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:58:51 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:41:46 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:\r
+> > Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 26 at  9:21 pm:\r
+> > > +                                       ("flagged" :foreground "red"))\r
+> > \r
+> > Red is pretty universally used to indicate danger or a serious\r
+> > condition, while "flagged" is simply supposed to draw attention.  I\r
+> > would say blue as a neutral and distinct indicator, but it also has\r
+> > poor visibility (I used to use blue, but found that when scanning my\r
+> > mail, I would habitually skip over flagged messages because they were\r
+> > dark, which was the opposite of what I wanted).  Personally I've\r
+> > settled on yellow; it's visually distinct enough to be easily\r
+> > noticeable and bright enough that I don't skip over it, though it\r
+> > obviously wouldn't work on a light background.\r
+> \r
+> Can be yellow, I don't really care that much. But isn't a light\r
+> background the default for emacs in most distros? If that matters,\r
+> *shrug*.\r
+\r
+Ugh, yellow is absolutely horrible on a white background... that would\r
+certainly draw people to figure out how to change the settings. Now\r
+shall I send v2 with bold for unread and yellow for flagged, or can this\r
+go in as it is?\r
+\r
+BR,\r
+Jani.\r