_pkg_use_enabled(other_pkg),
other_pkg.iuse.is_valid_flag,
parent_use=parent_use)
+ # It's possible for autounmask to change
+ # parent_use such that the unevaluated form
+ # of the atom now matches, even though the
+ # earlier evaluated form (from before
+ # autounmask changed parent_use) does not.
+ # In this case (see bug #374423), it's
+ # expected that violated_atom.use is None.
+ # Since the atom now matches, we don't want
+ # to display it in the slot conflict
+ # message, so we simply ignore it and rely
+ # on the autounmask display to communicate
+ # the necessary USE change to the user.
+ if violated_atom.use is None:
+ continue
if use in violated_atom.use.enabled or \
use in violated_atom.use.disabled:
unconditional_use_deps.add((ppkg, atom))