The last two releases mistakenly installed the conf.d and init.d files using the old buildslave
name. The 9999 ebuild had not been properly updated to the new buildbot_worker name.
As a result the 0.9.2 and 0.9.3 releases were installing them as buildslave.
This caused problems in downstream installations/scripts expecting the init script to be
named "buildbot_worker".
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3_p23, Repoman-2.3.1_p16
doman docs/buildbot-worker.1
- newconfd "${FILESDIR}/buildbot_worker.confd" buildslave
- newinitd "${FILESDIR}/buildbot_worker.initd" buildslave
+ newconfd "${FILESDIR}/buildbot_worker.confd" buildbot_worker
+ newinitd "${FILESDIR}/buildbot_worker.initd" buildbot_worker
readme.gentoo_create_doc
}
pkg_postinst() {
readme.gentoo_print_elog
+ ewarn "The 0.9.2 and 0.9.3 original ebuilds had a mistake naming the"
+ ewarn "conf.d and init.d files as 'buildslave', when it should have been"
+ ewarn "'buildbot_worker' as it is in the previous 0.9 versions."
+ ewarn "Only the 0.8 and previous versions should use the name 'buildslave'"
}
doman docs/buildbot-worker.1
- newconfd "${FILESDIR}/buildbot_worker.confd" buildslave
- newinitd "${FILESDIR}/buildbot_worker.initd" buildslave
+ newconfd "${FILESDIR}/buildbot_worker.confd" buildbot_worker
+ newinitd "${FILESDIR}/buildbot_worker.initd" buildbot_worker
readme.gentoo_create_doc
}
pkg_postinst() {
readme.gentoo_print_elog
+ ewarn "conf.d and init.d files as 'buildslave', when it should have been"
+ ewarn "'buildbot_worker' as it is in the previous 0.9 versions."
+ ewarn "Only the 0.8 and previous versions should use the name 'buildslave'"
}
doman docs/buildbot-worker.1
- newconfd "${FILESDIR}/buildbot_worker.confd" buildslave
- newinitd "${FILESDIR}/buildbot_worker.initd" buildslave
+ newconfd "${FILESDIR}/buildbot_worker.confd" buildbot_worker
+ newinitd "${FILESDIR}/buildbot_worker.initd" buildbot_worker
readme.gentoo_create_doc
}