Re: [alot] reply from search mode

diff --git a/ff/1d820cb5a7c31d499c7ca772cacbd0d7772ade b/ff/1d820cb5a7c31d499c7ca772cacbd0d7772ade
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9bd182d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ff/1d820cb5a7c31d499c7ca772cacbd0d7772ade
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+Return-Path: <patricktotzke@googlemail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE97431FBC\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  6 Mar 2012 13:17:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id nfTyt-nQpGl6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue,  6 Mar 2012 13:17:53 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com\r
+       [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2BE3431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  6 Mar 2012 13:17:52 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by wico1 with SMTP id o1so2860323wic.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:17:50 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:user-agent\r
+       :to:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:date;\r
+       bh=eCx2NkzRo3Tnd80Vg2RT6qzii+nbAxoby5jh9bp00/4=;\r
+       b=HJMjEPAByKB+GdPnFiRYWNMq/Yuz8/F2v2esNcRhSO9vDKmay+Mhz6Ce0VCLX9s/UA\r
+       CCV357cSLc6rgPjIm0PKAeLXedzrPWFA+glGcDh76zLWqpbKvBTLBolaCfhLVKIGjaZb\r
+       XjfKY8k9p/Zg+9O3duQgYhZkv2QRVcSCpjIu8TMZ9py2flcgd1/34OPhqBL9she55B65\r
+       b34SB7oXU3BCRw1VXVc7t1FghRel2rva7Rgj3B7hfpMEYKqaLbUVleD9lU9AaG3nDt9o\r
+       CuoGIdzTujn7+h7lARfyf3dM4UNpSdGbFBXjFTxIfXprEhIPXhOIINY0VFXbuq87v/Ux\r
+       Y79w==\r
+Received: by 10.180.86.230 with SMTP id s6mr21697878wiz.16.1331068669989;\r
+       Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:17:49 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (cpc1-sgyl2-0-0-cust548.18-2.cable.virginmedia.com.\r
+       [82.41.10.37])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h19sm31028527wiw.9.2012.03.06.13.17.48\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:17:49 -0800 (PST)\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+From: Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@googlemail.com>\r
+User-Agent: alot/0.21+\r
+To: Philippe LeCavalier <support@plecavalier.com>,  notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+References: <20120306160016.2673.36080@plc.plecavalier.com>\r
+In-Reply-To: <20120306160016.2673.36080@plc.plecavalier.com>\r
+Message-ID: <20120306211747.31898.21772@brick.lan>\r
+Subject: Re: [alot] reply from search mode\r
+Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:17:47 +0000\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:17:53 -0000\r
+\r
+Quoting Philippe LeCavalier (2012-03-06 16:00:16)\r
+>How would I add a reply key binding to reply directly from the search\r
+>mode. ie something like R. Forward and editnew would be nice as well.\r
+\r
+This could indeed be useful, but I'm not convinced this is a great idea in =\r
+general:\r
+What would that command do if your selection is a thread with multiple leaf=\r
+-mails?\r
+reply to the first? ask the user?\r
+\r
+cheers,\r
+/p\r
+\r
+\r