Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs
authorDavid Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:13:35 +0000 (12:13 +2100)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:47:51 +0000 (09:47 -0800)
c9/2e9e35bffa493368c0342a80c18905e37ea36b [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/c9/2e9e35bffa493368c0342a80c18905e37ea36b b/c9/2e9e35bffa493368c0342a80c18905e37ea36b
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..04fae2a
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF77431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:13:42 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id C4ULgslHLU3A for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:13:41 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE8A1431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:13:41 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)\r
+       (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1SkGPc-0001sr-LY; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:13:40 -0300\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1SkGPX-0005AZ-5Z; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:13:35 -0300\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Ethan <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>,\r
+       Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs\r
+In-Reply-To:\r
+ <CAOJ+Ob0Kw0Kkhh9C27Xv9gvqtNowzQiNqrLAtvti7fL8NND2+w@mail.gmail.com>\r
+References: <1340656899-5644-1-git-send-email-ethan@betacantrips.com>\r
+       <877gutnmf1.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+       <CAOJ+Ob0Kw0Kkhh9C27Xv9gvqtNowzQiNqrLAtvti7fL8NND2+w@mail.gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:13:35 -0300\r
+Message-ID: <87hatvlba8.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:13:42 -0000\r
+\r
+Ethan <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com> writes:\r
+>\r
+> Yeah, I don't even know how an mbox message gets flagged read and I don't\r
+> know how I would support it.\r
+>\r
+\r
+I think read only access to mboxes is fine. Yes, somebody will be\r
+unhappy, but the only convincing argument I have heard for mboxes or\r
+similar formats is archival use.\r
+\r
+d\r