Re: [PATCH 4/8] man: clarify search --exclude documentation

diff --git a/a9/f7a8173aa4c8e0715a880607218e9bec58d475 b/a9/f7a8173aa4c8e0715a880607218e9bec58d475
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..90e06b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/a9/f7a8173aa4c8e0715a880607218e9bec58d475
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B49431FC0\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -1.098\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,\r
+       NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id IeUkcW7vogcI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:08:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3C75431FBF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:08:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])\r
+       by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1ShRCC-0005ys-Hx; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:08:08 +0100\r
+Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]\r
+       helo=localhost)\r
+       by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)\r
+       (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)\r
+       id 1ShRCC-0003GS-BX; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:08:08 +0100\r
+From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
+To: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] man: clarify search --exclude documentation\r
+In-Reply-To: <1340198947-29370-5-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+References: <1340198947-29370-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+       <1340198947-29370-5-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+63~g548a9bf (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:08:05 +0100\r
+Message-ID: <87ehp93fx6.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223\r
+X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record.  :)\r
+X-QM-Body-MD5: 6a3db29cdfd4c9847d6f1458932b103e (of first 20000 bytes)\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8\r
+X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -\r
+X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to\r
+       determine if it is\r
+       spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.\r
+       This message scored -1.8 points.\r
+       Summary of the scoring: \r
+       * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,\r
+       *      medium trust\r
+       *      [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]\r
+       * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail\r
+       provider *      (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)\r
+       * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay\r
+       *      domain\r
+       *  0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list\r
+X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:08:13 -0000\r
+\r
+\r
+I have reviewed all the new parts of this series (judged as being\r
+patches 3-8) and the changes made to my two patches and they are all\r
+fine (with one small comment below). Patch 1/8 does need a proper review\r
+though as it ended up more intrusive than I would have liked.\r
+\r
+> +Messages matching search.tag_exclude are called "excluded messages".\r
+\r
+My one comment is that this is not quite true if the corresponding tag\r
+is in the query. Since you are defining the term it would be nice to\r
+mention that, but I can't see a clean wording.\r
+\r
+This should not hold up the series as it your wording is clearly an\r
+improvement on the current wording.\r
+\r
+Best wishes\r
+\r
+Mark\r