Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: new mua mailto: URI handler

diff --git a/65/75236413071f2550c6cf96d9f2b403380ce4ac b/65/75236413071f2550c6cf96d9f2b403380ce4ac
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c36ffaa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/65/75236413071f2550c6cf96d9f2b403380ce4ac
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7275D431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id F5ABdMLvxWgb for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA647431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F8A66E0021;\r
+       Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (unknown [76.89.193.65])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBBD66E00A8;\r
+       Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 86D9E45D; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: new mua mailto: URI handler\r
+In-Reply-To: <87wr5idprb.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+References: <1327865624-7673-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <1327865624-7673-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+       <87hawmyt8k.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+       <87wr5idprb.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+122~g81f44b7 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:36:04 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <87bomucaq3.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:36:12 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Sat, Apr 14 2012, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
+> I'm going through the review queue right now, tagging notmuch::stale any\r
+> patches that don't apply on master. I was just about to nmbug push stale\r
+> on this one (2/2). Is that in error? Care to verify?\r
+\r
+Yes, it is an error.  This patch applies to master.  Did you in fact\r
+verify that it doesn't?  You should not be tagging patches stale if they\r
+in fact still apply to master.  If they still need review or something\r
+else that's a different matter.  Please don't mark things as stale if\r
+they are not.\r
+\r
+Obviously I still care about this patch, or I wouldn't have re-commented\r
+on it.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPid+0AAoJEO00zqvie6q8oxcQAKuTHoKdhb0WlVsOPDqeLiD/\r
+KeKn5SQ0Hx/bEKq3m0VhJq27L6iS2eSrXiZimxOSody80XOV8ONjNj+bnX+e2cRx\r
+t+1ZojI+JgfzUElWH61Ngwun0XQwRvtCZ4cF7bFL+IZAkNs5bhBCMxmMMge7VatV\r
+VeeEvnXufpLFC4jbhYqQ7PP0Ufc8ypfsY0/eDyJq9y+2m1+PUzVN772/Vi/4uVQG\r
+VoSsz/H1rezbTAG9FSfh42tLgd4VbWLRvBWmZt4g3kATeGJrXVR4fFx3PbY3lseN\r
+E5CKXFgNGWqkJOVtLdpBcOVFWs4M/obA1+Ay5QArho2RjZqhjCNwXQZzgCEih4sZ\r
+Bu3JNNoBhPFrnjI1OWSHpRjkO6zMmT8c8DB5nFfXtqzfbsd+1CJIizqZ8QxMfItV\r
+4QS1kklymZFTOXWxCFIDe/GQ68cX6pcW3eAQY0mAJE2iaxcfsMihHMdQ3sUz0iun\r
+qUgjzBo/h0kQBEV4ch3Grg4H+VVPG9GsJavs/Cnp0rD1klPj1pVPLgCuu1OOLQnJ\r
+XPVdZ+4icX+TbQbemrptYMU+5Fpx8+KOu96oZ1+7V8ptj0P4m+LUJ17eGNV0s+Ln\r
+IJhDAdFjrprBWlw1FDVkyJoWE7vUNR89AG1sik6im2JdJZWMgLab/83jfkX4eco0\r
+R3Pe8ZwS2laWEHiDHWFY\r
+=cvRL\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r