Re: Reply code with TEXT/PLAIN

diff --git a/27/b8a27feee048102e008cf2de19112eb7ae5531 b/27/b8a27feee048102e008cf2de19112eb7ae5531
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1ac9bfe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/27/b8a27feee048102e008cf2de19112eb7ae5531
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC70431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id F7jQqUj6IBYM for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:24:43 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47EA431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:24:43 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from [192.168.23.207] (dsl254-070-154.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net\r
+       [216.254.70.154])\r
+       by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDDC6F970\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:24:39 -0400 (EDT)\r
+Message-ID: <4F708A2D.90800@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:24:29 -0400\r
+From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;\r
+       rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120325 Icedove/10.0.3\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: Reply code with TEXT/PLAIN\r
+References: <87d3814qkv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+       <CAMoJFUuGS_y4Sqtug5Ohdic3M43_fexWOt7cAw-ebuZ_SVUnjQ@mail.gmail.com>\r
+       <8762drl766.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+In-Reply-To: <8762drl766.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;\r
+       protocol="application/pgp-signature";\r
+       boundary="------------enig61FDFA38AC29B61BA2540529"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+Reply-To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:24:44 -0000\r
+\r
+This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)\r
+--------------enig61FDFA38AC29B61BA2540529\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On 03/26/2012 11:21 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:\r
+> Does it make sense for the cli to canonicalize the content types to\r
+> always be lower case?  Or should it continue to just pass the content\r
+> type exactly as it appears in the original message?  Given that\r
+> consumers should parse it case insensitively, it maybe doesn't matter,\r
+> but it might also be nice for us to be consistent.\r
+\r
+i think "notmuch emits the content-type in the exact form contained in\r
+the underlying message" is a good flavor of consistency.\r
+\r
+       --dkg\r
+\r
+\r
+\r
+--------------enig61FDFA38AC29B61BA2540529\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
+Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature\r
+Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
+Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/\r
+\r
+iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJPcIozXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w\r
+ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwRUU1QkU5NzkyODJEODBCOUY3NTQwRjFD\r
+Q0QyRUQ5NEQyMTczOUU5AAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpumoQAIiZ0FDnWAS3kBQ45KFiafOQ\r
+U03/lnAfX2YLWfa/jyut68XtqkfVRX0dj4EJTHQP7QNa+xLCQ8fnZb3/EvZKmE2/\r
+1sl/z4z8Dii54hDuxWKs01SrzexvXlIgRYGXFkOhvsd8LKIxvvm83bl3g887b35C\r
+f8Y3j4i24RD9/3ecSa02ay6R1tYqNPiIVDvJVAq8/+ogJ99crQUDXP91PmIhHt4L\r
+s25OiL/qOp14EMtTpyWmSchay6pNhd88k981dgX9q1rFUEWHWDk2K7DZ87JvozNk\r
+dYhgUAkNpeFyiiGsrlSNiSvhsgR6dvfCYB+fFP6Fofs1Df12nWssVR4GazVnOdH9\r
+TfTciTuilQ9bXyIkQY8zZyuwBUIOkIsRnBTDQaBIY51kGYP0z4gPKlwYhl+iYjm4\r
+GDuIM/o9078iz+5RU+l2bBD05AO+vKzAvElJg7vMqqwpiTN9eFpANTCitwTpvjGQ\r
+1e+IsxKXJN61P7xcoMovdQats1zrOnk/D3vbFEwESFxKjWQQKQX7DauJnK74YPY4\r
+j0wYzzJyzxL/Nj1y0nFQt2wVlgDvkmKkww9190b55A+3Arhi/rSMPJYgXaGEQmjE\r
+ACWWTm2ElxGXNvZzY/dZyukqldISL0Q5oqy24nlX4UhKNtj8g/K/5xMcJI1zbIhL\r
+mMnuIbbeTS9c1ib9mq6o\r
+=VWe3\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+\r
+--------------enig61FDFA38AC29B61BA2540529--\r