Re: nomuch_addresses.py

diff --git a/9c/d319c3aaacc10cc48eaefb99fcd2d2109ceef3 b/9c/d319c3aaacc10cc48eaefb99fcd2d2109ceef3
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..8cf3347
--- /dev/null
+++ b/9c/d319c3aaacc10cc48eaefb99fcd2d2109ceef3
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB828431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:30:20 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
+       autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id cBqMtKxc1V2O for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:30:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADEDE431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:30:16 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142166230117.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net\r
+       ([142.166.230.117] helo=zancas.localnet)\r
+       by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)\r
+       (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1RzwLi-00064r-Ib; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:30:15 -0400\r
+Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)\r
+       (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)\r
+       id 1RzwLd-0007Rz-8V; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:30:05 -0400\r
+From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+To: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: nomuch_addresses.py\r
+In-Reply-To: <20120221091509.8534.59492@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>\r
+References: <87r4xur3rv.fsf@plc.plecavalier.com>\r
+       <87fweamenf.fsf@schoepe.localhost>\r
+       <20120221091509.8534.59492@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+188~ga5674c2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:30:05 -0400\r
+Message-ID: <87mx8cylo2.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Spam_bar: -\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:30:20 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:15:09 -0000, Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:\r
+\r
+> I do get the feeling that it is perceived as desirable not to require\r
+> any kind of notmuch bindings (David once said something similar about\r
+> nmbug).\r
+\r
+I think nmbug is a different case from an optional utility. And yes, I\r
+still think it is better not to need the python bindings installed (and\r
+working) in order to report a bug, or develop the core/cli.  Of course\r
+it isn't the only factor, who knows what will happen in the future.\r
+\r
+d\r
+\r
+\r