Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs?

diff --git a/db/9213d17d245186b4fad08d78d977676166ef56 b/db/9213d17d245186b4fad08d78d977676166ef56
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2f20803
--- /dev/null
+++ b/db/9213d17d245186b4fad08d78d977676166ef56
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+Return-Path: <james@jamesvasile.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABBD431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 Mar 2012 09:04:45 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.373\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.373 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id h7cmPY-FsWXn for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Thu,  8 Mar 2012 09:04:44 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from hackervisions.org (67-207-143-141.slicehost.net\r
+       [67.207.143.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D24B9431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 Mar 2012 09:04:44 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from 095-097-039-212.static.chello.nl ([95.97.39.212]\r
+ helo=localhost)       by hackervisions.org with esmtpsa\r
+ (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)  (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from\r
+ <james@jamesvasile.com>)      id 1S5glg-0004n7-9t     for notmuch@notmuchmail.org;\r
+ Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:04:44 -0500\r
+From: James Vasile <james@hackervisions.org>\r
+To: notmuch mailing list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+Subject: Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs?\r
+In-Reply-To: <87k42vrqve.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+References: <87k42vrqve.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+206~gf3628de (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:04:36 -0500\r
+Message-ID: <87ipif2fdn.fsf@wyzanski.jamesvasile.com>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:04:45 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:37:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:\r
+> Any ideas on how to approach this?\r
+\r
+Treat messages with the same ID but different hashes as different?\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPWOakAAoJECaDklOuuidYL+gH/0pQ8aLH65Fjle01nfgqfehx\r
+c29lvq76jbdxLIcrqR1vpp0U7PfE3zBofVI+aAL2r9oe/HcMcpyAKMJboFgyu6Ok\r
+pqZfnbizCaPWiF1TfTvkfSjLueGx0dRqUZ5DVar0lDa1+W/n7df/yQFeMjAibdXQ\r
+H7H+1kJHVc4uE2SWGCXKtCd6moH2xn6t/Gc7sJ/ZexSUylqLc3RXoyu/cfQ109Ag\r
+z7RGM5PbSyA3cmzCP8lsWqekm//er/5MdhGMOmKA8QB7IGoWQzejQwPq7R2tPavV\r
+yLVCjXWeZ3XuD7UZciDCbmxXtWguXEUe9x2mU5EUOWlcTXJzKhr0o+1AMP1+99M=\r
+=ASCf\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r