Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] Reply enhancements
authorJameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:13:08 +0000 (12:13 +1700)
committerW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:45:34 +0000 (09:45 -0800)
1b/bb63d513a51877302e0498ca5199e1cf6dabf3 [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/1b/bb63d513a51877302e0498ca5199e1cf6dabf3 b/1b/bb63d513a51877302e0498ca5199e1cf6dabf3
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9c4d7c5
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE86431FAF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id Nn6MLhqnaIQi for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+       [131.215.239.19])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA4F431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1AA22E50E81;\r
+       Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:14:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (unknown [70.42.157.22])\r
+       (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+       by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ADC2E50E85;\r
+       Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:13:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+       id 0A1E2445; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:13:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] Reply enhancements\r
+In-Reply-To: <1331525142-30539-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+References: <1331525142-30539-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+306~g05d342c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+       (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:13:08 -0700\r
+Message-ID: <8762e3dosb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+       micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:14:08 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+\r
+On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:05:32 -0600, Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> wrote:\r
+> * I noticed that reply supports a --decrypt option, and the emacs interface\r
+>   actually does use it. I've documented the option in the reply man page.\r
+>   If someone can test that replying to encrypted messages actually works in\r
+>   emacs, that would be great - I have no way to test this.\r
+\r
+The test suite actually includes a test for replying to encrypted\r
+messages (see crypto: "reply to encrypted message").  That test should\r
+run as long as gnupg is available on the test system, and if it passes\r
+you should be good to go.\r
+\r
+But in any event I have tested this patch set, including the decryption\r
+option, and it all looks good to me.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPZOJEAAoJEO00zqvie6q8vJMP/0Fm4ILUwTEidfjiDR+SdD+i\r
+QuL6MyZt4OZuRAKWFNOJtojMg+Y0CbIq5DvuW/UpYLZilVUEDqhzKLuuWQiJtssZ\r
+eM+mkdH/baOw+fMeo6KAbDv6NpejXwA/WDcU+T6dD+Y3xAHn+OeLoRUnm612FVzm\r
+IYkCVRV9chSb/7o1VrlE/IBk2p99JaQ0vaZWYcgrD6Wo30CLt0Xzhgjy9hPlH61C\r
+W0izlwxHj0E0vjpIsjReid+jZQeHZ2NxS2c65rm9f9wGvlzy9dBDcNi9BS91aVMj\r
+SoJkFQn9cagbJ77Zbn/haLHJDi2l5+F2xRFTdAHE8h+uYFoxDe9rCq7oVTFqChqC\r
+h2tLPe2HaaoVCpsG2JnZ4IuoWg6C7Gmc55E6UTNm8au6wBMhrF1b8OHYMJAhQNgn\r
+LiU+m/xjCuZwubMEdWMtOnpH6iuQOOgPVSHBMrUppz6TmMhH17eJyqUT7VcwGivh\r
+YqblXPRJfYyo1w+BtJiTLgJsYbWELuT45NqrfP5fTre365sWWG7lYFxchc/+cEl/\r
+/FFx4eOMCVLEaoinm4DTMHTwZqpfJJjOIiyDVDvR180r2E3HCXxHqOP6fTnczoy8\r
+RVcE1M6o+Q4qWf0Oou1Ojc7tAX6Y+FVK1FSuMl9fgjSFTfym9qM8paC3bY+x8gWx\r
+4z5sqmb0+/2hCp8s8EP+\r
+=EBmf\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r