Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] indicate length of omitted body content

diff --git a/c4/6fac970928ac08fef214cf6739e64bc512556a b/c4/6fac970928ac08fef214cf6739e64bc512556a
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..591caab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/c4/6fac970928ac08fef214cf6739e64bc512556a
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2B7431FC2\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:04:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+       FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id QNs3E0HoiT0H for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:04:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from mail-da0-f53.google.com (mail-da0-f53.google.com\r
+       [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 781EB431FBF\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:04:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by mail-da0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x6so1792920dac.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:04:33 -0800 (PST)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version\r
+       :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding;\r
+       bh=n0gf+E/6ymnoU7tXAwL1J2UZQfJw0XFkNHuuOJZqf70=;\r
+       b=zlwCLsRH9tjICXbftZU4X4wb1+Nc3f9bFOKPTsnfuwgHMFJ1vF3vqAJNPqAz1t/pJj\r
+       jV1ljmUxJXXgRbYoJF4ycePumfJxreny1orAobCkysljklfW0BCxya/tzuSQg+zfSB28\r
+       yQtIqCZuIq+OmHIo5ZSRCIc2eWGI5fZArOhD5lbKuxpbAjYxMJRjpBGY7WV/TNVfp2JR\r
+       Qucjv2N0n2HOYvOTPzSFt9jBpVcdqRAiowoN3f8RIvEd89Ot2f57TdoQprJWxMcflUeG\r
+       7xJxopzfkzx3tMieamSZPPBBPcvN0i9ZNafSFjXOlrW1+liamC0SLdanZXnDFpBCNy8I\r
+       dqZA==\r
+Received: by 10.68.192.74 with SMTP id he10mr2462359pbc.147.1355569473606;\r
+       Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:04:33 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
+       [220.233.42.215])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o5sm4872063paz.32.2012.12.15.03.04.30\r
+       (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
+       Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:04:32 -0800 (PST)\r
+Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:04:27 +1100\r
+Message-ID: <20121215220427.GA29080@hili.localdomain>\r
+From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] indicate length of omitted body content\r
+In-Reply-To: <87a9tfemaa.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+References: <1355540805-24937-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
+       <87a9tfemaa.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:04:36 -0000\r
+\r
+On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 08:45:33 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> \r
+> This version looks good to me with one very minor comments:\r
+> \r
+> Perhaps the name format-omitted-part-meta should include sprinter (eg\r
+> format-omitted-part-meta-sprinter)?\r
+\r
+Seems so. I'll roll up another series if that's necessary.\r
+\r
+Peter\r