--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <me@pavpanchekha.com>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DC4431FBC\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 23:04:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
+ HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id 9PoCrXzaMTjX for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon, 14 May 2012 23:04:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-gg0-f181.google.com (mail-gg0-f181.google.com\r
+ [209.85.161.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+ (No client certificate requested)\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D442431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 23:04:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by ggnv5 with SMTP id v5so1815139ggn.26\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 14 May 2012 23:04:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=pavpanchekha.com; s=google;\r
+ h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:from:date:message-id:subject:to\r
+ :content-type; bh=Y6cKco1vwcBuh8bIohx1yDznVbtevTiu+x7rxGgYRiY=;\r
+ b=qi97xKM6ACsxwxyAbNw3vwU07KVFd9cEWXrIrIKDrOg5z0dUq6QMSwTB+puo82MAFt\r
+ DlZ8/T0vb4jJ1EBW61dDn87UnRYiZ3dbYRDcq+cIzXGGr1dO6Tfe4O/62C/mnAiG4HT5\r
+ B7mXLHwJ/u8IH/cTQlf+QxgJuipKnTyk40ERU=\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+ d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+ h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:from:date:message-id:subject:to\r
+ :content-type:x-gm-message-state;\r
+ bh=Y6cKco1vwcBuh8bIohx1yDznVbtevTiu+x7rxGgYRiY=;\r
+ b=pKBBOWEaEgBQwh+xlcpJr3vPsAxzvKAnQ+ENJkEY9iQWVA6d24YKc8XPRdajcv3B8f\r
+ dY6Hyd35kvkkrN4URI9Kxq3FcYDdby/0++FrmLk2S0y72SNxnmu4k2kejlkNwEYJj0PQ\r
+ pEd7Z4fvqQDKf9PCQjulCAolgX/QC1MjXUGUceSZ+GJhqPZ5TMTu6SXSDqmgIGtfmRJD\r
+ 737UJcOgHylGbvvghpANTzpjD8Sj656bglx/bNxmbTR9+9QHiOv2PcNybqDjMGGS2bt0\r
+ 0U2HOC68lKKXKCv+wBtW7w58dTvSlyGPGEkJ/M0fT28iGn3HAVqSMNdvI+Vb41f2TTfo\r
+ 5UWQ==\r
+Received: by 10.50.47.230 with SMTP id g6mr6733074ign.74.1337061858760; Mon,\r
+ 14 May 2012 23:04:18 -0700 (PDT)\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Received: by 10.50.76.135 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2012 23:03:58 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Originating-IP: [18.248.3.226]\r
+From: Pavel Panchekha <me@pavpanchekha.com>\r
+Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 02:03:58 -0400\r
+Message-ID:\r
+ <CAE4=OQ80RLush229xi9uUu4VjG2tBrCmGcG7sGeVZbje7-ZBjw@mail.gmail.com>\r
+Subject: Mark feature in notmuch.el\r
+To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340a372257d704c00cf942\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQkCwKEMO5zAIZvH+yIYAMXQJaVZOs1ppB/Nr2CwCU2PsJBD9KEaP880RqGTYMPZt3Jz8rwx\r
+X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 May 2012 02:07:50 -0700\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 06:04:21 -0000\r
+\r
+--14dae9340a372257d704c00cf942\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
+\r
+I was wondering if there were any plans to add a "mark" feature. By\r
+hitting some keybinding, one could mark some set of mails and then apply\r
+operations to them as a batch. This would be often useful for me for, for\r
+example, tagging all mails matching a search except some. If there were a\r
+way to mark ranges, this would also make the syntax of date searches less\r
+painful.\r
+\r
+- Pavel Panchekha\r
+\r
+--14dae9340a372257d704c00cf942\r
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+<div>I was wondering if there were any plans to add a "mark" feat=\r
+ure. =C2=A0By hitting some keybinding, one could mark some set of mails and=\r
+ then apply operations to them as a batch. =C2=A0This would be often useful=\r
+ for me for, for example, tagging all mails matching a search except some. =\r
+=C2=A0If there were a way to mark ranges, this would also make the syntax o=\r
+f date searches less painful.</div>\r
+\r
+<br clear=3D"all">- Pavel Panchekha<br><br>\r
+\r
+--14dae9340a372257d704c00cf942--\r