--- /dev/null
+Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B6F431FAF\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:07:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+ tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+ by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+ with ESMTP id ZQBdy8Fuv8PY for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+ Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:07:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
+ [131.215.239.19])\r
+ by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCE4431FAE\r
+ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:07:05 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+ by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA652E50D21;\r
+ Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:07:00 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
+Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com\r
+ [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
+ by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2782E50D30;\r
+ Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:06:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
+ id 4CB674CC; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:06:57 -0800 (PST)\r
+From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
+To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] emacs: Prefer '[No Subject]' to blank subjects.\r
+In-Reply-To: <cunvcnk4d45.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+References: <1327496913-4946-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+ <1327918561-16245-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+ <1327918561-16245-3-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>\r
+ <87sjiobfu1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+ <cunvcnk4d45.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+156~gde94716 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
+ (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:06:54 -0800\r
+Message-ID: <87obtcbd29.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
+ micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+ <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+ <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:07:05 -0000\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
+\r
+On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:47:38 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
+> On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:07:02 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@fines=\r
+tructure.net> wrote:\r
+> > Sorry to be so late on this, but I'm not a big fan of this new feature.\r
+> > I would prefer to always see the subject (or any other field for that\r
+> > matter) as is.\r
+>=20\r
+> The Emacs UI always replaced blank subjects with '[No Subject]' in\r
+> buffer names. The printing code also needed something other than a blank\r
+> subject for buffer renaming.\r
+\r
+I don't much care what the buffer name is. That seems to be a\r
+completely different issue to me.\r
+\r
+> Updating `notmuch-prettify-subject' to use a user configurable string\r
+> (that can be set to the empty string) sounds like a good idea. Please\r
+> ensure that the various other bits of code that require something other\r
+> than a blank subject still work properly.\r
+\r
+I am actually perfectly happy to see this patch reverted.\r
+\r
+jamie.\r
+\r
+--=-=-=\r
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
+\r
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
+\r
+iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPL4oeAAoJEO00zqvie6q8ka0P/AguahtI7DY6FlsOIV6i1cPs\r
+6gEHPbtQVTARTJI7EedESFO/9mv1FqrqY/IUJHxAmrkp0GqDArrevF50F0i4ayT9\r
+v9y7LkC+HiU7CgbIBnIXSm+6+8ZOTovUGI9JpNhSjEy58iLZmPOGzevewleKB7uo\r
+9Tz1gvGNex2uWox+c0pgPE3HxiMNsqt2ScYhY6Fq0Mh2ALoFMx3PnPc6lrxanalT\r
+VJbp5mK6m2e46u3GcSRcfxQpWLX7w16tUueFnUiQxdC5tYR+V0t5d1MQeLSy89kz\r
+rJaXGLN79KlyU56MqyEjRT5COK7+oOt719MP3ECt7G+ICl3eJh5XL6UnME2NOWp8\r
+cWh3r2N1M8IkUXoZSoj3rlpDX+ID3iTPYhQMCboXbHIaqY53W5t2M4f6N5YjIIXJ\r
+lVoi0oZBdVqQMsbcblO4t+ugyLC9mEtl1n7J039P9eIDlHwVL+4vcNFELasfu2/q\r
+T0OnPpETji7Gw31QD2rQZdyTmoAdXnKmMvL81J5jmheSPkHfQA0+aKGDtw136hMe\r
+fh/R5YWP3AKlUDzefeIAHCMUioKIdJ1B7/c/CYrD68URIclPklYPHseWOVDwPnJg\r
+FRy1IU1AOb90NJL9LnWe9X+QQaQVjRC0EwopbKY9105SB6PP/sRZVZN976uzOW7L\r
+XytzmRl1MWBNAfrWPxCI\r
+=JrGj\r
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
+--=-=-=--\r