Re: Using procmail to set tags

diff --git a/f2/5102beb7812359d51f0fdd91677113e77d88df b/f2/5102beb7812359d51f0fdd91677113e77d88df
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..26a04ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/f2/5102beb7812359d51f0fdd91677113e77d88df
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C85431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 15 May 2012 03:57:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: -0.7\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id 6Um7+XrfhX4z for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Tue, 15 May 2012 03:57:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com\r
+       [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A759431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 15 May 2012 03:57:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: by qcsk26 with SMTP id k26so5280231qcs.26\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 15 May 2012 03:57:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
+       d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
+       h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date\r
+       :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state;\r
+       bh=d3FREM99bphaNqPRs73IzK7PBfC2OR7DlWvl8WmkuHI=;\r
+       b=G5huZoEdcFTE5/fZSBUuNe5UlRctFjO7CDJ6ajdpppoQLTJMs07U9CI1/H1DfzkYFm\r
+       UyZPNhMFAKpPZOKDp6yRakuh8IJiyU/xBQbAXpqe6MT8L0OG0x+Ab7AGYwY8bRbMAlH1\r
+       sGTLsP9lGszmtCn9AsR2o7SiIRqTlcYgmBKhRg/ufAXVpAx9pZaX3U+CHSinJb3/X+xy\r
+       TYQao2CpAtW0M2R5lDBxnFg1ZiWPp8DXxMaYtlfpC7lr0l3+XzPHRJtIiNXELPrspOno\r
+       g0u6H7jCUdQ3QI1J1EBkkB6EdGk9L3om4RDFIgyKyv5zzp4Sx51yBOYcZgNh6rI2qSNM\r
+       C6Zg==\r
+Received: by 10.224.205.6 with SMTP id fo6mr2511276qab.73.1337079477398;\r
+       Tue, 15 May 2012 03:57:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
+Received: from localhost (nikula.org. [92.243.24.172])\r
+       by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x10sm2322377qan.1.2012.05.15.03.57.55\r
+       (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 15 May 2012 03:57:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
+From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
+To: bryan hunt <mafubryan@gmail.com>, Robert Horn <rjhorn@alum.mit.edu>\r
+Subject: Re: Using procmail to set tags\r
+In-Reply-To: <1337076890.12535.2.camel@dsktp>\r
+References: <m3vcjyl4kg.fsf@quad.robs.office> <1337076890.12535.2.camel@dsktp>\r
+User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+222~ga47a98c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1\r
+       (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
+Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:57:54 +0000\r
+Message-ID: <87zk9990el.fsf@nikula.org>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+X-Gm-Message-State:\r
+ ALoCoQl+ylrIvijMWqru6tB7vH8050tWzrkQWR7fwfhVdxN5DCKcKSOpi60ykaz+yTAit5VrPpcR\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:58:00 -0000\r
+\r
+On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:14:50 +0100, bryan hunt <mafubryan@gmail.com> wrote:\r
+> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 19:34 -0400, Robert Horn wrote:\r
+> > Is it practical (and has anyone documented) using a procmail setup to\r
+> > set initial tags for messages using notmuch?\r
+> > \r
+> > I've just started using emacs-notmuch to read mail, and I'm using a\r
+> > system where I have procmail filters to bin mail by category into\r
+> > folders.  I can continue this using folder:value for searching, but one\r
+> > reason notmuch interests me is the potential to do more.\r
+> > \r
+> > It's practical for me to assign potentially overlapping tags with a more\r
+> > sophisticated procmail setup.  Notmuch tags enable having multiple tags\r
+> > on one email.\r
+> > \r
+> > I don't know enough about the procmail/notmuch process to see just how\r
+> > to make this happen.  I'm hoping that someone has already done something\r
+> > similar.\r
+> > \r
+> > R Horn\r
+> > rjhorn@alum.mit.edu\r
+> \r
+> You could have procmail fire a python script to add or remove tags based\r
+> upon message content. \r
+\r
+Note that you need to run 'notmuch new' after the message has been\r
+delivered in order to modify the tags. Otherwise notmuch does not know\r
+about the message.\r
+\r
+> The problem is that the tag removal isn't being saved. \r
+> I've created a bug report with the developer:\r
+> \r
+> https://bitbucket.org/spaetz/cnotmuch/issue/1/removing-tags-doesnt-seem-to-be-saving\r
+\r
+That repository is obsolete; the notmuch python bindings have been\r
+merged into upstream notmuch. If you still have problems, please report\r
+them on this list.\r
+\r
+\r
+J.\r