Re: [PATCH 0/4 v4] lib: Maildir flags synchronization fixes

diff --git a/05/27409fdd8a120629952a9ca177860fc4a308bd b/05/27409fdd8a120629952a9ca177860fc4a308bd
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1ecc024
--- /dev/null
+++ b/05/27409fdd8a120629952a9ca177860fc4a308bd
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+Return-Path: <quite@hack.org>\r
+X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052E1431FB6\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Nov 2012 16:16:36 -0800 (PST)\r
+X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
+X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
+X-Spam-Score: 0.001\r
+X-Spam-Level: \r
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
+       tests=[FAKE_REPLY_C=0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
+Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
+       by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
+       with ESMTP id nNMOYX9j68Dc for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
+       Mon,  5 Nov 2012 16:16:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from ecki.hack.org (ecki.hack.org [194.109.217.58])\r
+       (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
+       (No client certificate requested)\r
+       by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C0F431FAE\r
+       for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  5 Nov 2012 16:16:35 -0800 (PST)\r
+Received: from 84-217-31-28.tn.glocalnet.net ([84.217.31.28]\r
+       helo=kelebek.lublin.se)\r
+       by ecki.hack.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)\r
+       id 1TVWqH-000D89-Rw; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 01:16:33 +0100\r
+Received: from quite by kelebek.lublin.se with local (Exim 4.80.1)\r
+       (envelope-from <quite@hack.org>)\r
+       id 1TVWqH-0005fn-4o; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 01:16:33 +0100\r
+Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 01:16:33 +0100\r
+From: Daniel <quite@hack.org>\r
+To: Louis Rilling <l.rilling@av7.net>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
+Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v4] lib: Maildir flags synchronization fixes\r
+Message-ID: <20121106001633.GA14918@kelebek.lublin.se>\r
+MIME-Version: 1.0\r
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
+Content-Disposition: inline\r
+In-Reply-To: <8762idt2d5.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
+       <1316039001-32602-1-git-send-email-l.rilling@av7.net>\r
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)\r
+Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
+Precedence: list\r
+List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
+       <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
+List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
+List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
+List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
+List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
+       <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:16:36 -0000\r
+\r
+On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:23:17AM +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:\r
+> The intent for the fourth patch (detailed in the commit log) is to allow mutt\r
+> users to keep using the "new" status, as long as notmuch can respect the\r
+> maildir specification.\r
+> \r
+> The third patch implements a test for the new desired behavior. From recent\r
+> discussions I decided to put it before the actual changes, but it certainly can\r
+> move after if this is preferred.\r
+\r
+On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 08:41:42PM -0400, David Bremner wrote:\r
+> I pushed the first two patches in this series; the second two need to be\r
+> updated for the new "broken test" framework, and reviewed.\r
+\r
+And old one... What came of this patch?\r
+\r
+I came across it, having been annoyed by the fact that notmuch broke my reading\r
+habits by marking messages (in the mutt sense) as seen, which I hadn't really\r
+seen yet in mutt. I tried out the patch; it applied and seems to work. What can\r
+I do to make it be applied? Other than giving it some attention. I must say\r
+that I have zero insight in the test framework, but if that's what's needed\r
+from me...\r
+\r